this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
21 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alabama Republicans are poised to pass new congressional district maps that ignore a Supreme Court order to create a second majority-Black district. The proposed maps include a district that is only 42% Black in the House plan and 38% Black in the Senate plan, which voting rights groups say would not give Black voters a real chance to elect candidates of their choice. Plaintiffs who challenged the original maps as a violation of the Voting Rights Act plan to fight the new maps in court as well, arguing that Alabama Republicans are intentionally drawing maps that disenfranchise Black voters in defiance of the Supreme Court order. The new maps have drawn national attention, with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy reaching out to Alabama legislators to discuss how the maps could impact control of Congress.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 year ago

Using this precedent, Biden should cancel student debt.

[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Alabama governor is then going to fuck around and find out. He's not above the law and failure to comply with a court order could result in prosecution.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their goal isnt to win this fight, it's to delay the process long enough to install someone that'll declare them the victor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who's going to prosecute him? Garland? Lmao.

[–] lightninhopkins 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll admit the idea Alabama could have elected a female governor did not occur to me, seems somewhat out of character tbh.

[–] PostmodernPythia 6 points 1 year ago

Watch 2 minutes of her speaking, you’ll understand. She’s a GrandKaren.

[–] lightninhopkins 8 points 1 year ago

She. The governor is a woman.

[–] Sheerfire96@startrek.website 16 points 1 year ago

And Dems will refuse to either A) send in the national guard to enforce the law or B) say fuck it the courts are irrelevant and ignore all the BS decisions they want

[–] circularfish 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought we settled this shit in 1865.

[–] PostmodernPythia 4 points 1 year ago

1869 at the latest (Texas v. White)

[–] APassenger@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not even a little.

There was th Civil War and white folk got to pretend shit was settled while back folk knew better. Took until the 60s for things to start to shake up and even then White's weren't sure they should support something like requiring equal treatment.

Then we got the Voting Rights Act Then SCOTUS, in recent years, decided we didn't need that anymore. People are legitimately surprise the Court decided this way. Recent rulings have been a constant erosion.

[–] circularfish 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No doubt. I was thinking about Southern ‘patriots’ deciding they can ignore the federal government when it suits them. But to your point, they had to send in marshals just so little kids could go to school, and that happened in living memory so … yeah.

[–] ericjmorey 8 points 1 year ago

The three-judge panel that unanimously ordered the existing map redrawn last year is set to hold a hearing on Aug. 14, when it could decide to tap a special master.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/21/us/politics/alabama-congress-district-map.html