I’m genuinely worried about II. Not because I don’t think Gaiman can go it alone, but because the original had an unstable insanity to it that will be difficult to continue without being ridiculous for ridiculous’ sake.
I hope it’s good, of course.
Welcome to our virtual third place, The Café.
Come on in and make a new human connection over a cup of coffee (or Teh Tarik). This is a casual community, do whatever you want, share your oyen pics, your frustrations, and even organize a weekend picnic with the community. The world is your oyster.
Rules are simple, be kind and civil with each other. As with any other café, rude patrons will be kicked out.
I’m genuinely worried about II. Not because I don’t think Gaiman can go it alone, but because the original had an unstable insanity to it that will be difficult to continue without being ridiculous for ridiculous’ sake.
I hope it’s good, of course.
I think I'm out of the loop. Did he have a writing partner for the first season but not the second?
The first season is based entirely on the book that's cowritten with Terry Pratchett. How you feel about the second season that'll be entirely from him and despite early assurances there won't be more, depends on how you think he is as a writer. I think he's matured, but certainly the book was a favourite that counted him as a writer because he had Pratchett to humanize and bring down the stakes to what I consider to be his storytelling tics to be clever and a bit grand.
Oh my goodness. I've read that book 3 times but somehow I totally forgot that he wrote it with Pratchett. Embarassing. I really did enjoy the first season, though. I have high hopes for the second.
(that said, despite my issues with the series, for a lot of reasons, it's probably the best adaptation of a Pratchett story because on the other hand his characters don't seem to survive transition to visual media, e.g. the Discworld shows)
The second season was co-written with John Finnemore, so I think we’re safe. Finnemore has a similar vibe to Pterry.
tentatively crossing fingers Gaiman has gotten better at breaking a long form story as well, so we'll see
He actually co-authored the book with the late Terry Prachette. They had plans for a sequel, but that didn't pan out as PTerry was afflicted by dementia.
While it was never written, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gailman talked about the second book all through the night whenever they shared hotel room while promoting the first book. It's somewhere on Neil's tumblr where he said that.
So while it is only Neil that wrote the second season, i think he'd know what Terry wanted out of it too.
Yeah I agree, the thing that makes the book so good is the tag-team between Pratchett and Gaiman, Pratchett was amazing at mixing humor and seriousness like a true comedian. No offense towards Gaiman of course, but even if it's good it'll probably feel like something is missing, because it is.
The chemistry between Angel and Crawley is just umph chef's kiss.
Although, I'm the archangle fucking gabriel is said in such an impeccable manner.
Someone downvoted you, here's an upvote. Their chemistry and slow burn love is hnngghh.
I know right. I love it! That scene at the paintball arena. Angel was like 🥺🥺 devil could u help me with the stain. So cute 🥺🥺🥺🥺 Can't wait for season 2.
And the part where Crawley said, "I lost my best friend :("
Masterpiece
Actually reading the book right now for the first time! I'm about halfway through and really enjoying it so far.
I did watch the show when it first aired so I'm struggling not to picture Tennant and Sheen in the main parts but i think they did a pretty good job so I'm not too worried.
It's my first Gaiman book but umpteenth Pratchett. I think a second TV series without TP will work better than a second book would've done.
The BBC audio drama with Mark Heap and Peter Serafinawiz is also excellent. Gaiman and Pratchett make a small cameo playing some policemen!