Er, i have some problems with this article.
I do concede that it does make a good point about moral panics and media hype. Apparently millenariansim is a thing, and it's basically the belief that a big change is coming to society, and drastic action must be taken to manage The Big Change. AI, like other new technologies, is plagued with sensationalism. I also agree with reasons #1 and #2, they are solid points that I think should be taken more seriously, like the issues of "AI alignment" and making sure AI models in control of life critial systems do exactly what they are supposed to do in a safe manner.
However, past those reasons, the article is weaker in its arguments. Most of the basis of his argument assumes that the economic functions perfectly according to an neoliberal economics (and we see how well that went). We shouldn't be letting corporations, who time and time again, have abused their technology for the worse, be in charge of this new technology. In addition, the ending also troubled me in suggesting a technological Cold War with China. If we really wanted to stop China, the most reasonable thing would be to democratize the bleep out of AI, making sure no one country is never able to get a foothold.
Tldr: article does make some good points about moral panics and AI that shoild be further studied, but it falls short of its title because it relies heavily on ideal neoliberal economics
Thnak you for coming to my TED Talk.