this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

262 readers
1 users here now

c/formula1

Welcome to c/formula1.

Rules

Please keep discussions civil, respect other's opinions, and keep it friendly. Please read our rules before posting in our community.

Rules TLDR

Resources

These sites are a good place to start finding out about Formula 1, aside from right here of course!

Formula1.com - the official Formula 1 website.
Formula 1 Youtube - the official F1 youtube channel.
Liquipedia Overview - what's happening now and next in a nice dashboard.
F1Calendar.com - never miss a session again!
F1Countdown.com - for those of you who like countdowns!

Sister Communities

!Motorsports - for the love of racing outside of Formula 1.
!FormulaDank@Lemmy.world - because you love memes.
!simracing@lemmy.ml - let's race!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Slightly more interesting bit in the article:

Intriguingly, when asked about the importance of trust established with racing fellow F1 drivers, Russell suggested there were “maybe three drivers on the grid who you wouldn’t feel comfortable going against”. “There’s a trust between most of the drivers,” he added. “I don’t think [those three unnamed racers] have the spatial awareness of others.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LondonPilot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the point made in the headlines is pretty obvious. There's no benefit in being agressive when you're so much faster than everyone else.

I agree that the other point is more interesting. Especially the fact that those drivers he don't feel so comfortable going against, it's not because they're agressive, but becdause they don't (yet?) have the spacial awareness.

[–] TSMKFail@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess for those 3 drivers would be Max, KMag and maybe Stroll? I can't think of who else the 3rd driver could be but funnily enough, Stroll has been one of the best at wheel to wheel racing this year.

[–] LondonPilot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure about Max. Obviously this season is different, but in the past, I've always viewed him as someone who has excellent situational awareness - but slightly less honed risk management. But I don't think his situational awareness has ever been in question, only his risk management.

If RBR somehow screw up their car, and Max has to start really fighting again, I suspect we'd see far fewer incidents than a couple of years ago, because by then not only will he be older and wiser, but also because he's now proven himself to be one of the greatest of all time (and I say that as someone who is not a fan of Max, I just think it's objectively true), so there won't be any need to take the kinds of risks he used to take in the past.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ecksell@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Little bit of a misleading title, the article is more interesting.

Russell can be pretty changeable, but in this case I can see his point. Max can fire that rocketship on lap 1, and then its race over, no reason to do anything else but bring it home.

[–] Fluffysquash@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Champions in dominating cars drive less aggressively, you saw the same with Lewis in the Mercedes years. You’ll see Lewis drive more aggressively now than he did three years ago but not as much as before his dominating years.

[–] janoosh@szmer.info 2 points 1 year ago

Lewis was the same, now when he has a worse car people call his driving "vintage". I wonder, if Max sticks around for couple of years more and somehow RBR manage to screw up their car, if we will see a "vintage Max" as well.