this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
182 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37723 readers
60 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mainly use imgur to upload screenshots using sharex, would appreciate being pointed in the direction of any alternative.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Windshear@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As someone who doesn't know, what's wrong with imgur?

Edit: Thanks for the info guys.

[–] idle@158436977.xyz 66 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Imgur announced recently they are going to be purging images that haven't been viewed for x amount of time.

[–] coldblade2000 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't they always, though? Pretty sure since the beginning it purged anything that hasn't been viewed for something like 6 months or so. That's why you got a lot of dead links in old Reddit (or others) posts

[–] snw@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

I don't think so, I've never had this happen in the few cases where I revisited an imgur url after years of not visiting it

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you’re just shitposting dank memes, having the pictures deleted after a while shouldn’t be a big problem. If you’re posting something a bit more valuable, consider keeping the pictures on flickr or even pixelfed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bouncing@partizle.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not necessarily a bad thing, as long as you aren't using it for archival purposes. I would prefer not everything I post live forever.

[–] StateParkMasturbator@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I'd agree for identifying pictures, image hosting that suddenly doesn't one day becomes a huge problem for a lot of old tutorial-based content. Look at any old car forum for examples.

[–] SkepticElliptic 2 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about this problem recently after I got an email from photobucket that I was over the new limit of photos. I think a more appropriate place to host tutorial content would be on GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zoop 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had heard about them deleting images uploaded without an account, and the nsfw purge stuff, but I hadn't heard about this. Thank you so much! I'll have to make extra sure that everything I've uploaded on my account over the years is for sure backed up elsewhere.

Do you know if this is already happening, or is there a date in the future that it'll start? Most of my uploads are private and I'm too busy to get all of it manually downloaded right this moment (if it's even still there!) Crud! I only just finally managed to download aaallll my years of stuff from Photobucket after they stopped allowing free hosting, lol.

Thanks for the info, I really appreciate it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boogers19@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

They just stopped hosting porn. Dont know why OP is asking but quite a few people were scrambling for a replacement a couple of weeks ago on reddit.

[–] deedasmi@lemmy.timdn.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Requires an account to upload these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] communist 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

pixelfed might work for you.

[–] gabuwu 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks interesting and I will def be joining, but it does seem more instagramy than specifically free image hosting.

[–] communist 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you can ignore that and hotlink the images, I believe.

[–] bouncing@partizle.com 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, but most (all?) pixelfed instances are run by volunteers. If someone's using their instance just to hotlink images elsewhere, an admin might decide it's not worth it.

Of course, that's true for just using a pixelfed instance for its documented purpose, but at least then you're probably privy to what's being discussed on the instance in terms of server costs, etc.

[–] tj111@lemmy.fmhy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Penguincoder 6 points 1 year ago

First thing I thought of as well. I like that they allow image expiration and not just forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anahkiasen@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can upload an image when creating a post by clicking on the small thumbnail icon at the bottom right of the file input

[–] chris@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some instances/servers are currently not capable of uploads larger than ~100kb, so a good image CDN is desired.

[–] Zoop 6 points 1 year ago

I also feel like lots of people uploading images directly to an instance's servers put a lot more strain on them - especially at a time where most servers are experiencing serious growing pains and may not really have the funds to keep expanding their storage. They're not ad supported like places like Reddit are.

I think it would be courteous of us to try and spread it out a bit and use services specifically intended for and set up for image hosting.

[–] palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

you can also copy and image and paste it straight into the text box, it will upload and embed the image:

This is straight from greenshot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kururin@hc.frorayz.tech 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jherazob 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been considering to self-host, Imgur clearly no longer wants to be in the image hosting business and wants to focus on their "community" instead

[–] steakfries@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do they have a sizable community? honestly i just assumed it was almost exclusively used for image hosting.

[–] Jurisprudentia@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's home to a very strange community unaware that their "platform" was just an image host for users of an actual social media platform. Well, at least it was before imgur recently started adding social media features and purged nsfw content.

Popular image posts from reddit would routinely get boosted (sans context) to the top of imgur's homepage, which would attract confused, angry, and often unintentionally hilarious comments from imgur users. Iirc there was a subreddit dedicated to this phenomenon.

Edit: sp

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mr_pip@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago
[–] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 13 points 1 year ago
[–] bouncing@partizle.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want something very cheap (though not necessarily totally free), and within your control, just get an AWS S3 bucket and put them there. Or possibly Backblaze.

[–] nfld0001 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, I'm gradually shifting to S3 for my public direct file sharing as a bit of an exercise in learning AWS. It's not free, but 99.99% of the time it's remarkably cheap. If you're willing to put up with learning AWS (or any other general-purpose platform really, cloud or self-hosted,) there's a nice feeling that comes with having more leniency to do things your way and on your terms.

Now whether it works properly, however, let alone work at all, is an entirely different story. But that's the double-edged sword with going out on your own: it's more likely to be your fault, not someone else's.

id be pretty psyched if my video embedding starts working one of these days 👨‍💻

[–] simple@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ClammyMantis488 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They delete your photos if they're unaccessed by the uploader after a year unfortunately. Ask me how I found out :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] monerobull@monero.town 7 points 1 year ago

I found this because I was testing out nostr and suddenly had loli.net in the firewall logs (apparently a content delivery network): https://sm.ms/

I like it because it gives you markdown you can paste into lemmy :D

[–] pokkst@monero.town 6 points 1 year ago

anonfiles.com

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

I've not looked into it fully but there is that pixelfed which is a part of the fediverse, don't know how it works for public images and whatnot though since it touts itself as a secure platform where you can choose who can see your stuff kind of deal

imgs if you want to self host something simple.

https://github.com/gechandesu/imgs/

[–] aponigricon 4 points 1 year ago

No they don't? 🤔 I'm pretty sure they did once, but right now I am able to upload images with no account. Just dragging the file into the browser window works.

I've been using my Onedrive storage that comes with my Office subscription. It's not ideal but at least I have some control over how longer the link is available.

Since you're asking for an imgur alternative, I assume that you're looking for something free. My suggestion might not be what you're looking for.

[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

I have been using lensdump

[–] matricaria@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago
[–] loops 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›