this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

nixos

46 readers
1 users here now

All about NixOS - https://nixos.org/

founded 4 years ago
 

Hello, I was wondering what version (23.05, 22.11, unstable, etc) of nixpkgs you use. I personally use unstable, and it's never broken.

Edit: I also have a master input in my flake, which I added just for XIVLauncher (context: someone made a PR to fix it not building, and it got merged into master, but last time I checked it wasn't backported to unstable)

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kotatsuyaki 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to follow the latest stable channel. After embracing flakes (which made version pinning easy and integrated), I've moved to just pinning unstable for the fresh packages. I update the flake about once a month, when I have spare time to deal with potential breakages in case there's any.

[–] Ultra980@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I update my flake inputs almost every time I use my PC (sometimes multiple times a day), and the only thing that breaks (rarely) is sddm, which is fixed by rebuilding again from TTY.

[–] kotatsuyaki 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. How often does it trigger mass re-download from the binary cache? I'm on a not-so-fast home internet connection, so if mass rebuilds occur too often, I would spend a lot of time waiting for the downloads.

[–] Ultra980@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

...every time

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use a fork (with some stuff I haven't cleaned up enough to PR) that I rebase on master whenever I decide to upgrade, because I like maximum pain.

Although honestly it's still really stable. When something breaks, it's usually easy to bisect and fix.

[–] Ultra980@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You basically use master? Holy sh*t dude, good luck with that.

If you just want to have some packages that aren't in nixpkgs, then why not just create a custom flake?

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I'm only just trying to move to flakes now. I've had this process in place for years.

I do have some packages in overlay form, but the nixpks changes are things that should be upstreamed at some point. They mostly either have open PRs or aren't cleaned up enough to PR.

https://github.com/corngood/nixpkgs/commits/master

That's the actual branch where I merge in my changes.

Here's a random example of a change:

https://github.com/corngood/nixpkgs/commit/fc12baf28104d63fc163e9afe2aea24409522729

I find it much easier to maintain something like that as a patch, rather than an overlay (if that's even possible).

[–] Ultra980@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That makes sense

[–] KraftPunk@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I use 23.05. Most Software in it is new enough for me. If I need something newer I just geht it from unstable.

[–] matejc@matejc.com 3 points 1 year ago

I am using my own unstable nixpkgs, with nixmy (https://github.com/matejc/nixmy/blob/master/default.nix). Currently on 251 update of unstable channel :D I have it it my fork of nixpkgs: https://github.com/matejc/nixpkgs/tree/mylocal251

[–] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

unstable all the way babyyyyyy

[–] eursec@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Unstable always. Very rarely the build breaks, but that just means I can't update my systems for a few days. Due to the atomic updates, my systems themselves have never broken.

[–] nrabulinski 1 points 1 year ago

Unstable on all my machines and servers

load more comments
view more: next ›