this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3924 readers
3 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Natural gas’s dominance as power-plant fuel in the US is fading fast as the cost of electricity generated by wind farms and solar projects tumbles, according to Guggenheim Securities.

Utility-scale solar is now about a third cheaper than gas-fired power, while onshore wind is about 44% less expensive, Guggenheim analysts led by Shahriar Pourreza said Monday in a note to clients.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bettyspaghetti 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s incredible. I hadn’t been paying attention to the cost of solar in the last few years because I live in a community with an HOA that doesn’t allow solar panels. Smh.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

maybe time to start bugging the HOA board

[–] bettyspaghetti 5 points 1 year ago

Yup a few of us have requested it be added to the agenda of the next meeting. I fucking hate HOAs.

[–] argv_minus_one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Rooftops without solar panels are an eyesore.

[–] edent@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

I wrote a long and detailed reply to you… and then realised you said "without".

I 100% agree with you!

[–] bettyspaghetti 5 points 1 year ago

Completely agree. A scorched earth from climate change is more of an eyesore than solar panels on rooftops but okay HOA.

[–] cavemeat 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh this is excellent news, since the profit monkeys might start seeing dollars and we finalky start mass migrating to solar power.

[–] Daedalus 3 points 1 year ago

I think we're soon going to get to the point when anything other than solar/wind gets rejected on the financial basis, except cases not covered by solar/wind (still need some baseload).

As solar gets cheaper, even baseload/heating should be viable - there are many energy storage methods that are 'inefficient' but scale better than li-ion - thermal storage, various 'heavy' battery chemistries, even making hydrogen or synfuels - you can have 50% energy loss if it costs 50% of the alternatives and you'd be unable to use it on peak sunlight anyway.