All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
I got an ebike recently to try and enjoy riding and not be stuck in a car as much. To be honest with you guys riding around with cars on the road in my US town is terrifying even still.
Eagerly awaiting when we get more interconnected bike paths that have less interactions with cars.
Ebikes are the way for me as well. I would love to ride transit more but it's so inefficient in my city. For a lot of trips I make biking is more convenient even than driving
I love my e-bike, but I definitely have to keep routes in mind when riding. The big stroads across town don't have bike lanes, and I don't think I'd be comfortable with just a painted one on such a busy road.
I wish I could ride to work. Unfortunately, there is no route other than taking a left turn on a 4-lane highway. That is not safe on a bike.
Supposedly my city is adding a pedestrian underpass that would connect my work to home, but that's been planned for 4 years now, so I don't think they're making any work on it.
In my town I ride my ebike downtown for some errands. It's about 30 minutes each way. Not bad, so I thought what does it look like in winter when it's going to be snowy and rainy and yuck outside? Transit would have taken me 40 minutes. Which isn't bad at all, I would have taken it except that the 40 minute trip was 10 minutes on the bus and 30 minutes walking.
I just rode my bike.
Man, driving to the affordable grocery store near us is like 20 min, but biking or taking the bus there is so circuitous and takes like 3x as long.
I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is dense here, comparable to a lot of non-capital European cities. However getting around by bike or public transportation is still impossible. I'd love to bike to work. 95% of my commute route is a single expressway, and even though it has tons of room on both sides, there is no bike lane. Instead I would have to make a multi-hour detour, or risk my life biking right next to cars and trucks driving 60mph. So I drive like everyone else...
I understand wanting a walk-able city/town; it is what I want. That said, I've always got the feeling that some don't fully understand just how rural some areas of the world are. Places like Wyoming, Manitoba, or Alaska are going to be biased towards relying on your own transportation for the foreseeable future.
Though I wonder if there would be a future for some passenger rail between larger communities?
And that's fine. The problem is that in North America, if you want real urban, you have NYC and that's about it. And it's stupid expensive because it's all there is. If we can just build up some more cities and create some more supply of walkable stock, things could be so much better. Wyoming can stay Wyoming. Hell, Houston can stay Houston. But we can at least push a few more cities to the ideals we want.
Most people don't live in rural Wyoming, they live in dense cities
Well, imo the way to do this is to increase density and diversity of functionalities in the neighborhood which obviously is going to be hard in an existing place. With those two elements, we can make sure more people are close to another function and make sure people have a reason to stay within their neighborhood rather than go somewhere else to accomplish functions other than housing.
That said, changing norms is just a big challenge and it's even harder when it concerns housing.
Meanwhile in the Netherlands (I don’t live there but was just there on a trip)
