this post was submitted on 13 May 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
11 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm just curious and don't want to break any rules

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] remington 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Anything that we deem is not nice.

[–] glad_cat9187 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hi, ~~Kuro5hin~~ ~~Slashdot~~ ~~Digg~~ Reddit refugee here. Please keep it that way, it reminds me of the newsgroups or old communities when the web started, and it's really better than fake rules with vague legal text. Also thanks for the web site.

[–] remington 6 points 2 years ago

I will do everything in my power to keep it this way. Welcome to Beehaw.

[–] Pinklacey 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's very vague, that could be anything though. Can you be more specific

[–] Gaywallet 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It is intentionally vague. Please see the sidebar for the posts what is beehaw? and beehaw is a community. In particular that second link talks about the ethos of why the rules are intentionally vague. In short, this prevents anyone from being malicious and hiding behind rules to "just ask questions" or otherwise harass members with impunity.

[–] Pinklacey 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Intentionally vague makes me think it's that way on purpose so y'all can ban whoever you want

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

they can ban whoever they want, they own the website. Just like fb and twitter can ban whoever they want.

[–] Pinklacey 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You're not wrong. But how does that make a successful website when you ban everyone who challenges ideas? People are mean in real life, all some are, and I don't see how just banning what you don't like makes you prepared to deal with 'mean' people.

[–] Gaywallet 8 points 2 years ago

This is not a space for mean people. They are not welcome.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But how does that make a successful website when you ban everyone who challenges ideas?

It doesn't, but why would you think that they ban everyone who challenges ideas? They only want you to be nice.

People are mean in real life, all some are, and I don’t see how just banning what you don’t like makes you prepared to deal with ‘mean’ people.

Maybe that doesn't perfectly prepare you, but not every website needs to do that. Other websites exist, on many of them you can literally be as mean as you want.

[–] Pinklacey 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Like which websites can you be as mean as you want? I haven't come across that

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess there's the chans, 4chan, 8kun etc. for one

[–] Pinklacey 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

there's tons of websites, but they rarely are big, because nobody wants to spend time on them. Even on fedi, look at https://freespeechextremist.com/main/public and more. Did you even try finding any of them?

[–] alyaza 12 points 2 years ago

it’s that way on purpose so y’all can ban whoever you want

it is that way on purpose, and it is so we can ban people on an as-needed basis (which i guess in a sense is "whoever [we] want") but excluding obvious trolls i think we've banned literally three people ever on the instance and it's been extant for a year. using intuition on what's acceptable and what's not--and nudging them when they break a boundary--appears to work quite well for our users, so we're not liable to start writing explicit rules any time soon

[–] remington 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We have three admins here...odd number to break ties. Us three will discuss, if need be, what is nice and what is not nice. Most of the time this just boils down to common sense.

[–] Pinklacey 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ok, what if someone is being an asshole, can I call them out on that or do you immediately just ban them? What if I disagree with someone and that person gets pissed and calls me a homophobe or something, can I defend myself and my position?

[–] heady 11 points 2 years ago

If you exceed 100 asshole units then you will be autobanned by one of the cyborg mods.

[–] Gaywallet 9 points 2 years ago

Did you read the posts the linked you? I talk in depth about how discussions are encouraged. However, calling people names is not nice unless it's warranted by behavior. Bans aren't quick and fast and reactionary; behavior is to be discussed among all individuals involved.

[–] Abrogha 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Have had bad experiences with reddit mods. So it's hard to say when people are being what. So this statement seems a little ambiguous.

[–] alyaza 3 points 2 years ago

Have had bad experiences with reddit mods. So it’s hard to say when people are being what.

i think it'd be useful in this case to go in with a blank slate, just on the basis that while this functions in many ways like reddit, it isn't reddit. as noted elsewhere in this thread we've really not needed to ban people and this place has existed for over a year.

[–] remington 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have you tried reading the rest of the comments in this post? You may want to try that first.

[–] Abrogha 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I did. Some of them...... But the vagueness is still concerning

[–] estelle 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

this is sexypink / alice / pinklacey / CharlesMcFuck's acct if anyone is wondering

[–] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wasn't. Should I have been? Who is that person, and why should I care?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I'm assuming someone who pushed the rules too far and got the hammer

[–] Pinklacey 5 points 2 years ago