this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Buy European

18 readers
94 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to switch from those American for profit news outlets to Euro or non-profit news outlets, what are my options?

I will list the ones I know and I find here:

  • Bloomberg: TBA.
  • Reuters : Associated Press.
  • New York Times: Follow The Money, Mediapart.
  • Politico: The Guardian.
  • The Verge: The Register, Techzine, Heise.
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 4 points 22 hours ago

The Register is a British tech news website. It's like if The Verge was even more techy, more sarcastic, and cared less about being trendy. I like it and read it sometimes.

The Register also has a few connected sites that cover different tech specialities. E.g. DevClass which focuses on news in the software development world.

[โ€“] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Reuters is owned by the Thompson Family via Thompson Reuters. Theyโ€™re for-profit, but Canadian.

[โ€“] Kualdir@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I know you probably came more for the Boycott US but this is Buy European and we shouldn't mix those up really

[โ€“] F04118F@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

I agree!

I think that we will keep having a mixup of "Buy European", "Boycott US" and "Privacy" because of the typical overlap of reasons why consumers change their behavior. I really like the visualisations that acknowledge this difference and indicate which alternatives satisfy which reasons for wanting to switch away from American providers.

[โ€“] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Not sure if op edited the original question before or after your comment, but I say the question is definitely is about 'buying' European despite also being about not buying American. As of now this is what op asks: "I want to switch from those American for profit news outlets to Euro or non-profit news outlets, what are my options?"

[โ€“] Mee@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Reuters aid government agencies in their investigations.

Matter of fact, they got sued for their privacy.

More about this:

On Oct. 11, a San Francisco judge gave preliminary approval to a settlement that would see Thomson Reuters cough up $27.5 million, mostly to state residents. The deal caps off a legal battle that began in 2020: Two Alameda County activists sued the media giant over its Clear product, accusing the company of compiling millions of peopleโ€™s personal data and putting it up for sale on the searchable database.

[โ€“] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't know which one is it a replacement for, but I like https://www.europeancorrespondent.com/ for their quick summaries about what is happening across Europe

They are mostly e-mail based (weekly or daily, split into north, central, eastern, western Europe that you cna opt in) but you can read it on their website also if you want.

[โ€“] furby@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

theguardian.com is uk local but good world and euro coverage imho.

[โ€“] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not from the UK and read them, they have an 'international edition' (although online and in the app it's just a filter I suppose). Skip most stuff about uk, but still.

They also have a two or three weekend magazines which are not free but it's not hard to find the pdf online.

[โ€“] PussButton@lemmy.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Mee@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my humble opinion, it does not really replace any of them.

[โ€“] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm from the UK and would agree with you. Now is not the time to be consuming content from any government media

[โ€“] JohnSmith@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[โ€“] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

My nemesis! I get to be John Smith on the next splinter site - deal?! :)

[โ€“] PussButton@lemmy.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's also not the time to be consuming content from companies to be fair

[โ€“] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fair. I'm just trying to be alert to who controls the media I consume. Too many people in the UK blindly trust BBC and then criticise Russians for listening to what their government tell them

[โ€“] JohnSmith@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any news outlet will have a bias. If nothing else, the broader culture a news organisation operates in will inherently influence their decisions.

I would say BBC is nowhere near the worst, though. Arguing they are Government controlled is just silly. You drawing a comparison to Russian media organisations is a load of tosh.

[โ€“] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right. Clearly RT has more direct collusion with its government, I just get uncomfortable with people holding BBC up higher than any media

[โ€“] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

JohnSmith and NotJohnSmith taking different sides of the argument, lol.

Anyway I like the BBC. I don't blindly trust it, because I read other sources too, like Sky News, The Guardian, and others. But I think the BBC is very good. And I definitely don't think it suffers from the sort of government control that RT does. There's a difference between government-owned and government-controlled.

[โ€“] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 1 points 22 hours ago

Thanks, this and TheRealJohnSmith's dialogue is helping me to be a little more open to it

[โ€“] PussButton@lemmy.org 3 points 1 day ago

True, but that's something you'll always have to keep in mind when reading any kind of news.

[โ€“] sled_user@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

The best switch for me from Politico EU, was switching to RFI, and a couple more lefty opinion places like theequaltimes, thecanary, mediapart etc

[โ€“] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Boycott those billionaires!

[โ€“] snuggledick@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Careful about Heise. Their tech news are probably alright but they also got Telepolis which is their super weird conspiracy nut pro-russian political branch and it's easy to end up reading that shit on their intermixed website.

[โ€“] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The economist BBC News The guardian

[โ€“] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The Economist is wildly expensive for Profit that is basically a spokesperson magazine for the 1%.

They villify all welfare even if it is lifesaving for hunderds of thousands, but oppose any tiny tax increases on companies or rich people.

It really is the 1%โ€™s magazine. I really would not recommend OP to switch to that given they are looking for non-profit not corporatified sources.

[โ€“] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

My understanding is that the board is held in a trust format to ensure editorial independence. They often do advocate for policies that would be beneficisl for all, and not the 1%

Of late, both times they supported trumps opposition.

They are one of the few internationally respected organisations that actually have news outside Europe and America, that's not business news from Japan or china.

It may not be for you and every news source is biased in some way but I find it quite balanced.

[โ€“] m0xEE@nosh0b10.m0xee.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@Mee@reddthat.com
Is Reuters US-based though? ๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] Mee@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As I said in my other comment:

Reuters aid government agencies in their investigations.

Matter of fact, they got sued for their privacy.

More about this:

On Oct. 11, a San Francisco judge gave preliminary approval to a settlement that would see Thomson Reuters cough up $27.5 million, mostly to state residents. The deal caps off a legal battle that began in 2020: Two Alameda County activists sued the media giant over its Clear product, accusing the company of compiling millions of peopleโ€™s personal data and putting it up for sale on the searchable database.

[โ€“] m0xEE@nosh0b10.m0xee.net 1 points 1 day ago

@Mee@reddthat.com
I see!

in my other comment

Federation not always work the way we want and not all posts get propagated to every instance, in this thread I only see the top post of yours, which @ueeu@vivaldi.net whom I follow replied to โ€” Fediverse moment ๐Ÿ˜