this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
173 points (100.0% liked)

Television

4 readers
58 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities-!britishtelly@feddit.uk
:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 6 points 3 hours ago

The Rogue storyline proves that New Who has a writing problem that has nothing to do with being too woke, and, in fact, at least in parts more with being not woke enough. What reason could there be to hint at, introduce, develop, carry out, end, and bury a love interest all within one single episode, if not as concession for people against those story line to be able to avoid it altogether? Disney isn't actually progressive, they never were, and where corporate pride/POC representation is implemented it's because the cost calculation tells them it pays off, not because they actually represent any of those values.

The Doctor would never give up on anyone. Heck, in the next episode he cried more about some random guard post than the man who proposed to him. Until he at least attempts to get Rogue back I will have to assume the Doctor has either been replaced by some kind of doppelganger, or the writers at Disney lack the balls to actually portray a modern and gay Doctor after all.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I feel that the whole "Woke/DEI" era will be remembered as a poorly timed inflection point. On one hand, you had the media conglomerates, who, instead of investing in original content decided to put stock in continuations of established franchises which often had poor writing and were poorly executed. These works also just happened to have a "diversity" angel to them. At the same time, we saw the increase in right wing voices online that started to infiltrate the fandoms of those already established franchises.

Social media algorithms also began to push this kind of content to a wider audience. How many times have you seen a random Youtube video with titles like " X is WOKE PROPAGANDA TRASH! Hollywoke is in DECLINE! " appear in your feed or homepage? If the work in question was a critical flop (i.e. terrible), it was not a flop because of creative deficiencies. No, it was a flop because it had a non-binary black character!

You never heard legitimate criticisms like "Hollywood is putting profits before good entertainment" or "[Show or movie] had poor writing, bad acting, terrible direction and didn't contribute anything to already established canon."

Take Deep Space 9 as an example. A great show with a very diverse cast but that diversity would be useless if the characters weren't as fleshed out as they were. Now imagine what the discourse around DS9 would look like if it were made today:

"A New BLACK Protagonist? Star Trek Has Gone WOKE!"

"Jadzia Dax and Odo: Trans Ideology PROPAGANDA?!"

When a new piece of media comes out and there is a massive stir attached to it, ask yourself this: is the criticism warranted or is it ideology driven?

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The people who cheer for the replacement of historically caucasian/male gender roles with minority actors/women, are the same people who protest the replacement of historically minority/women roles with caucasian/male actors. And they wonder why there's push back.

[–] Skavau@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on context. Doctor Who is a fictional character. Historical figures are not. It isn't hard to understand why there are different reactions there.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Scarlet Johansen as the Major in Ghost in the Shell Tilda Swinton as the Ancient One in Dr Strange Controversy around characters like Iron Fist etc

Asian fictional characters often get white washed. Results in protests from minority groups who feel they're being denied representation in their own culture's created artwork, and roles in movies/shows -- just like how replacing caucasian fictional characters results in protests from groups who feel they're having their cultural representation in media suppressed by minority interests. But whatever man. Guess those dont count.

[–] Skavau@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

I know nothing about those particular shows or films. I would expect a US remake of a show or film to possibly do recasts.

Does this upset you? I believe Thailand also did a modern reimagining of Snow White too, with a Thai actress playing the role.

Doctor Who has always been a character who can regenerate and reform by design. They're an alien species. I'd argue its more important they're eccentric guile heroes in performance than their sex or race.

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago

I've always loved the themes doctor who tries to address in its episodes, but it's sad in the most recent seasons they seem to have lost any form of subtlety/intelligence...

It used to be episodes showing you a moral dilemma, raising the question and often making it clear there is no perfect solution. The characters would make choice, maybe not the ones you'd make, but from understandable motivations. Sometimes the bad guys would have understandable motivations, and you'd feel sorry for them.

Lately it has been so black & white. More like "see this guy, he represents trump, trump is bad, he is bad". No dilemmas, no raising questions, not letting you think for yourself or challenging your beliefs. More like "this is good, this is bad, don't think more about it please".

I also don't think doctor who has become more woke, but it has become so much less intelligent, no longer considering the viewer as a person capable of reaching their own conclusions. Everything has to be clear and black and white. And if you don't agree with the protagonists you're bad.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t see people defending the newer shows by saying the writing is great or the plot tight. I just see arguments about politics and social messages.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The show turned to shit many years ago, way before any wokeness. There's nothing to defend.

[–] Val@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

this is what doctor who does. Just like in the 80s. It has it's ups and down, but its always changing. That's what makes it special. The doctor regenerates, the show-runner changes and the show moves on. It's not like the other shows that just get cancelled. It's doctor who. It's the longest running sci-fi show in the world.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Sethu and Gatwa’s pairing means that two people of color will pilot the Tardis for the first time in Doctor Who’s history. “Ncuti was like, ‘Look at us. We get to be in the Tardis. We’re going to piss off so many people’,” she said.

I know he what he means, but to be pedantic, this is not the first time a person of colour person has been in the Tardis. There have been several black companions (Mickey, Martha, Bill Potts); there have even been two people of colour as companions at the same time (Ryan and Yaz). You could even say that Martha was the first black doctor to pilot the Tardis. :P

I'm happy to see a POC Doctor and companion though.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they think Doctor Who has "gone" woke, they have not been watching.

I remember Captain Jack Harkness flirting with anything that moves, regardless of gender identity or species.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

These are the same people who say Star Trek has gone woke.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

Or that Rage Against the Machine has gone political

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have to disagree a bit here, the recent writing has tried to very heavily shoe-horn it in, whereas in the past it was much more naturally present.

I think the worst one for me (before I quit watching) was with the enormous spiders in the hotel run by a very Trumpian figure.

"Trump" wanted to just shoot the enormous spider, but the Doctor stopped him saying "no weapons, ever". The spider then died an agonizing death caused by suffocation on-screen mere seconds later. Her offspring was lured and locked into a storage room with food, after which they would surely either cannibalize themselves or starve. Actually shooting them would've been a mercy at that point.

When presented with the Doctor's solution versus the "Trump" solution, I felt more sympathy for "Trump". And I fucking hate that guy. That's when I knew the writing just wasn't for me anymore.

There's a reason even the more diehard Whovians, who are very much considered "woke" are tuning out. It's not the cast, it's the writing.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Doctor has been pretty anti-gun for as long as I've been watching. Honestly I just felt the Chibnal era lost a bit of magic, less campy/extreme/wild ride feeling to it. The first new season I thought was pretty decent.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 4 points 18 hours ago

True, but that translated into anti-violence most of the time. Here there was a chance to either give the creature mercy and kill it quickly, or let it suffer a horrible painful frightening death. At that point, what is exactly the ethical choice?

I thought the new run opened fairly poorly. Imo most of the issues I have with Who writing are still there.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I have to admit I kinda stopped following the series after Capaldi left.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

This reinforces my perspective that when people complain about "woke" media they are complaining about badly written media (which features minorities). The 2005 reboot of Doctor Who has always strongly featured minorities, but the quality has gradually declined season after season. Nobody complained about the bisexual Jack Harkness, who got his own spin-off. Different people gave up at different times -- IMO it was a dumpster fire by season 4 already, but others held on through the Matt Smith era or even the Capaldi era. (Not denying there were good episodes still now and then.) Series 11 was unwatchably bad -- but not because the Doctor was portrayed by a woman.

Similarly, Star Wars: Andor, has a lot of diversity in the cast! It's a great show, best Star Wars media since Episode V in my opinion. But it's Star Wars: The Adept people are calling woke, since it's trash.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back in the Tom Baker era, they routinely talked of the Prime Minister as 'she.'

Those shows were made long before Thatcher came to power.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doctor Who is responsible for Margaret Thatcher? Wow, maybe this show does suck after all.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those shows were made long before Thatcher came to power.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

They spoke it into existence.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

I have more criticism over Disney being involved in production than anything "woke".

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I just hope the new seasons has some good stories, I stopped watching after a few Capaldi episodes the stories were less interesting.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I will still watch it for reasons..... .....