this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

220 readers
169 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Canadian military leadership is close to their U.S. counterparts and is reluctant to shift its focus from America. Some retired Canadian Forces senior officers, such as former chief of the defence staff Gen. Rick Hillier, have voiced support for a Canada that is integrated more closely with the U.S. On Feb. 15, Hillier went on the social media website X to express his support for Canadian businessman Kevin O'Leary's proposal for a common dollar, integrated border and immigration requirements with the U.S.

But retired Vice Admiral Mark Norman has warned that Canada is under attack from the Americans.

Norman argued in a Feb. 14 National Post column that Canada should not sit back and let the U.S. destroy the country. "This may need to include otherwise previously unthinkable actions such as shutting off our oil and gas, electrical power and critical supplies, as well as the abandonment of historic diplomatic and military relationships and commitments," Norman pointed out.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago

Some retired Canadian Forces senior officers, such as former chief of the defence staff Gen. Rick Hillier, have voiced support for a Canada that is integrated more closely with the U.S.

Boy am I glad he is retired then.

I hope we tell this delegation that we are thrilled to see them and discuss this with them.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They may also want to put some feelers out towards Australia. The previous conservative government dragged the country into a deal for US submarines that seemed to be more politically motivated than practical, and that’s looking more in doubt every day.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They screwed over France for that right? Not sure if SK would take the risk with a buyer who thongs, I mean flip flops like that.

[–] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Canada can make the same deal with France.
I just hope the manual is in English...

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

Eh, if there's a usable French manual, we've got plenty of people who can translate it. (Korean not so much, maybe.)

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 4 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, we'll sell the sub to Québec so they can sell them again to the rest of Canada.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be best if Canada could just fend for itself. As we’ve seen, even relationships that seem rock solid can change very quickly.

Buying from the U.S. would be the worst possible choice.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

Thing is, we've got a large amount of very thinly populated Arctic land that we have to defend. Granted, modern equipment allows us to defend more land with less people, but it's expensive even without the requirement that it has to function in extreme cold. Maybe we could make it work, but we'd have to throw a lot of money at it, and the political will hasn't been there up to this point.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So Hillier is mad, got it.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, an army general isn't who I would listen to on subs. Especially when Adm. Norman is there.