this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
100 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

219 readers
118 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Linked National Post on purpose. Given their bias I believe they'd present the worst case scenario.

E: Apparently the article is from 2016 so the cost is likely higher today.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

Notwithstanding clause. Don't pay a fucking dime.

Besides war declared by US, that makes US permissions on every flight a deal breaker, the plane is a POS, and we should be refunded for returning every existing plane we may already have. Cancelling deal for cause, with zero penalty, despite any contract is the right move.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago

Ford blew twice that to put beer in gas stations. Clearly we have the money to blow 🤡

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Why bother paying anything? Let it go to court. Threatening annexation should fall under some kind of hostilities clause, national security clause, or force majeure clause. Anyway who's going to collect?

The US government can pay ~~MD~~ Lockheed, they're the ones who threatened annexation.

Edit... Fixed above, not sure why I had MacDonell Douglas on my mind...strange substitution for a company that no longer exists under that name.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Not saying you're wrong, but certainly that would be added to the made-up list of reasons to annex Canada.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 25 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

We need to pull out of this deal, the last thing Canada needs is to buy weapons from the country that has designs to annex us. And that sells weapons with kill switches.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Weapons they need permission to use.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

That feels like an internet rumour. How would that even work? Like if someone took out LM's servers all F-35s in the world would no longer function? If an enemy jammed the signal they wouldn't work?

There's no need to invent problems anyway. The US could potentially cut off Canada from parts needed to maintain the planes and that's reason enough to cancel it.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago

Exactly. Absolutely it has to be cancelled based on the fact that the imminent danger to Canada is from the US. No way we should be buying their weapons, listening to their media etc.

[–] sirspate@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That's an article from 2016.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh damn, I didn't notice. Thanks!

[–] Global_Liberty@lemmy.ml 13 points 14 hours ago

Of course Canada needs to leave. Do Canadian politicians think the US will supply it with parts as it invades?

Buy some Gripen and/or Eurofighters and join GCAP.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 13 points 15 hours ago

That's less than the total incurred costs of Ford's decision to break the contract with The Beer Store a year earlier than scheduled.

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I've been advocating joining GCAP, an effort by Japan, UK and Italy to make a 6th gen fighter. It isn't scheduled to deliver the final design until 2035 though, so we would still need a stopgap.

Still, it would send a pretty strong signal and also allow as a path to reinvigorate our domestic aerospace defence industry.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This looks like a good idea. We do have people in Lunenberg, NS that have experience with working with stealth materials which could be a significant contribution to that project.

Could we call it the Arrow? Though I'd also be cool with it being called Spitfire.

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if the final platform had room for national partner tweaks. Probably could call ours the Arrow 2: Strange Brew or something.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

America is currently at war with us, declared abruptly and out of nowhere. They just decided one day "we want to annex Canada!"

Even if Donald's presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control, I don't think it's a good idea to be trusting the Americans any more.

We need to disentangle ourselves from any military dependence on such ridiculously unreliable "allies." I'm all for this.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

I think everyone is thinking the same way. I think the probability of the US invading is low, but there is a probability.

Even if the US never uses their military against us, there's a very real chance they withhold parts for military equipment as leverage in a negotiation. They are already withholding military aid from Ukraine as leverage after all. That alone makes it imperative we end Canada's dependency on the US defense industry.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Even if Donald's presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control

I know the hamburglar has got his sights on Trump but if he takes his shot during the next 4 years the US gets JD Vance. Vance will be a lot worse than Trump, I do not know how Musk or Teil will handle Vance.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Don't cancel. "Pause" it until further notice

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

“Canada’s liability would be no greater than US$346.7 million” – the difference between what it had already contributed and what was remaining of the original US$551 million commitment.

Since the analysis was produced, the Liberal government has paid another US$33 million.

Considering that there are Canadian companies that have contracts related to the f35 and they would almost certainly be cancelled or not renewed, running down the clock isn't a terrible idea. The $300+m is already a sunk cost.

[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

No say will cancel it and then pause it then cancel the landing gear then pause that then cancel it pause it till it comes back looking like the avro arrow

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 30 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.saab.com/markets/canada/gripen-for-canada/built-for-canada-by-canada

From another page:

"In addition, Canada will have full and exclusive control over Gripen’s secure data – a unique advantage of our offer. The Gripen Centre in Montreal will host all work on the fighter's mission system and Canadians will carry out this work. With the mission system, communications and technical data all hosted in Canada, Gripen exceeds all industrial, security and controlled goods requirements. With Gripen the Royal Canadian Air Force will have maximum control over sensitive data handling."

It's a no brainer, in a world of digital warfare, needing to rely on a foreign home base is a tremendous liability.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 13 hours ago

How are they the only ones offering that, that needs to be table stakes to even bid

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago

Doug Ford spent much more on canceling various contracts on a whim. I say bail.

[–] Aconite@lemmy.ca 25 points 23 hours ago

Fuck it. They're an intelligence hazard and that's cheap in government terms.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. In this case I linked it on purpose because of their handlers.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)
  1. But it continues the notion that we should rely on them for information, when they have most certainly poisoned Canadian culture and politics.
  2. Also, by sending users to an American site, it increases their revenues, when this money could have gone to a Canadian media site.
  3. And if you aren't already aware, Canadian owned media is deliberately neglected because it's contrary to a particular elite group in this country... And yeah, we should support and grow Canadian owned media regardless of political party.

But if you still insist on supporting American media...

[–] Nils@lemmy.ca 5 points 20 hours ago

These are numbers from 2016. Is there any place where we can read these contracts? Maybe with the current situation, conditions are changing. Hopefully, people put a clause in case of animosity between countries.

[–] fletch@mapstodon.space 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah Europe should also cancel, the Saabs are excellent while the F35 always has had… issues, and we also got the inferior version too.

[–] fletch@mapstodon.space 4 points 22 hours ago

@nightwatch_admin you must make it at home, at scale, without reliance on enemies or potential enemies. It’s a reasonably simple matrix to optimise. Eurofighter and Saab, new Euro. Make Australia and Canada and New Zealand and UK demonstrate their commitment to a rules base world.

[–] adamsteer@mapstodon.space 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

@fletch @avidamoeba
IKR
it's a geostrategic steal compared to staying entrenched! I hope #auspol is listening.

[–] fletch@mapstodon.space 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

@adamsteer @avidamoeba time to put a proper moat around “EURO interoperability” interoperability with USA is a trap

[–] fletch@mapstodon.space 3 points 22 hours ago

@adamsteer @avidamoeba USA are gone from NATO, stand up, dig in. Is it the easy road? NO! Do you want a future where you steal a toilet for your home town? That’s where you’re headed, Russia