this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

1470 readers
26 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been building up my digital music library again after giving music streaming the boot. I was going to attempt to digitize my CD and vinyl collection, but I frankly don't have the time for all that. So I thought I might turn to file-sharing and download digital versions of my physical collection. I prefer FLAC or WAV if the former isn't available. Can you recommend good places to get started?

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pedro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 months ago

Nicotine+, a soulseek client

[–] junusdenised420@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the megathread has good sources, i personally use lucida

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Lucida is great especially from Qobuz !

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 22 points 2 months ago (6 children)

My list in order of desperation, lowest first

  • Soulseek
  • Public torrent trackers
  • Private torrent trackers
  • Spotify rippers (they come and go like waves on a beach)
  • yt-dlp youtube rip (please god have mercy on my bit-crushed soul)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Noggog@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I use Deezer. You pay for it per month like Spotify, but they have API to just download the songs straight up. I think the open source UI I've been using for that is on the rocks a bit, but do far still been working for me

https://www.reddit.com/r/deemix/comments/zlswiz/last_update_is_now_out/?rdt=33875

[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This doesn't sound like what I'm asking for. I'm not interested in paying Deezer for music I already own.

[–] Noggog@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Sure sure! Just a fallback to consider if you have trouble locating elsewhere, as I did. Spotify rippers were noticably bad quality, and torrents for music were very scarce compared to other media types. But maybe I missed something or there's better options now. Dropping $10 for a month to mass download everything at crisp quality isn't too bad an option, imo.

[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

I appreciate it. I always thought Deezer was just a streaming platform like Spotify.

Also, dang, surprised so many downvotes for my original comment lol.

[–] butter@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not gonna lie, I'm considering paying for Deezer to move back to this.

You can automate downloads with Lidarr. I'm set up to download every song by every artist that Last.FM recommends.

Currently, I'm using Soularr, but it's really slow and not always FLAC and not always full albums and the metadata is not always perfect.

[–] Noggog@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, nice. I gotta do the reverse and check out Soularr a bit. I imagine my Deezer setup will eventually implode, so I'll need a fallback haha

[–] butter@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

At the very least, be sure to put your current library out on soulseek.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

what.cd and a time machine

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Ugh, knife to my heart

[–] coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

only thing I would add to this thread is occasionally usenet can be handy if you’re looking for music that’s fairly mainstream. If you’re looking for some weird 7” that was self released with 50 copies that’s obviously not gonna work though

[–] Waffle@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not exactly what you're looking for in terms of being free, but you could get a Qobuz subscription then use Qobuz-dl to snag what you want to download in lossless quality.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

This is what I do. The streaming subscription isn’t that much, and I can download a single album or a txt file with multiple album links with just one command. Only downside of the streaming subscription is you will occasionally run into albums that are or have purchase-only tracks that you can’t download without buying the album, but I don’t seem to run into those too often.

Managed to get my entire library in FLAC except for one album - “I Love You Because,” the soundtrack to what is apparently an obscure musical based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice”.

[–] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Other than file-sharing or xdcc, where you can search for FLAC,

squid.wtf allows you to download FLACs from select providers.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It seems to consistently throw a WebAssembly is not defined error.

[–] Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A while ago when I last used it one of the two services worked while the other didn't. Have you tried both?

Or are you using a webbrowser with no WebAssembly support or WebAssembly disabled?

[–] radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Soulseek via slskd on my NAS to fill in the missings from Lidarr works really well. Gluetun with a VPN and sharing everything as it grows