this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

800 readers
65 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i would guess that people that deactivate js are fine not using google for search

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This breaks things like Whoogle that used the JavaScript-less api to pull search results.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 month ago

Any idea if it will break SearXNG?

[–] Wolfie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

True. I am one of those. I just use duckduckgo or swisscows or brave search.

[–] Oestradiolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] bebrusas@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] hakase@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Deutsche Geophysikalische Gesellschaft

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

I wish they would fix the bug where I can't click "images" with js disabled

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This coincides with Google search getting worse and now including the AI slop.

What's the best alternative to Google these days?

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What’s the best alternative to Google these days?

I use Kagi, it's great (great results, no ads, no tracking, a lot of clever filtering tools) but it's paid. Free, I would use Brave Search but I doesn't give me as much results as Kagi.

Edit: added links.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Typo in your link (but not in the text). https://searx.space

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago
[–] andreas@lemmy.kfed.org 16 points 1 month ago

SearXNG solves this (and many other problems)

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Why it is important to use alternative metadata fetcher like searxng

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Luckily, as of today I can still set my user agent to something like a Playstation or ancient firefox/IE to get a lightweight HTML-based page. The results are in www.google.com/url?q= format but I can use a redirector extension for that.

[–] M33@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better abandon google search for something else at this point. Even if alternative search engine calls bing and google, at least they take this BS out of the way

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you're right, but startpage is slower than lightweight google :p

[–] neatobuilds@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

The what page

[–] Tender@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

Motherf***ers

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Someone here use still Google for searching? 😳

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean on the list of reasons not to use Google, I feel like this one is pretty low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

Startpage.com does not

[–] mr_satan@monyet.cc 2 points 1 month ago

Wait this is new? I wasn't able to use google without JS for sometime.