Fediverse memes

8 readers

1 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Be respectful
Post on topic
No bigotry or hate speech

Other relevant communities:

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

BoozeOrWater@feddit.uk

Emperor@feddit.uk

recursive_recursion@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

206

We're RIGHT HERE :( (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24394554

Text for readability:

So far, Americans using RedNote have said they don't care if China has access to their data. Viral videos on TikTok in recent days have shown Americans jokingly saying they will miss their personal "Chinese spy," while others say they are purposefully giving RedNote access to their data in a show of protest against the wishes of the U.S. government.

"This also highlights the fact that people are thirsty for platforms that aren't controlled by the same few oligarchs," Quintin said. "People will happily jump to another platform even if it presents new, unknown risks."

(page 2) 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Scary_le_Poo 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Regarding the fediverse at large...

I believe that this is a design issue. Instances are designed so that they function like categories. That categories then have subcategories.

The issue is that with user distribution, you can't then just assign users round robin distribute the load. This leads to what we now have which is very confusing to the end user.

Users was a centralized experience. The duplication of communities is a prime example of the bad design.

In the abstract, I would consider putting all instances in a pool. Each instance runs a different community, with servers also duplicating x number of communities for the sake of redundancy (instance goes offline, content still exists on another server). It's complicated, and has it's own issues/flaws, but I believe that from a high level view, it is a better design in general.

The current system is just a mess unfortunately.

Perhaps there could be a hybrid of these two approaches that would be superior.

My back of the napkin design prioritizes user experience and ease of use. That said, I can immediately think of a few downsides.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Each instance runs a different community, with servers also duplicating x number of communities for the sake of redundancy (instance goes offline, content still exists on another server). It’s complicated, and has it’s own issues/flaws, but I believe that from a high level view, it is a better design in general.

How are policies/moderation decisions discussed between the instances? That's why you have different versions of the same instance, because !politics@lemmy.world and !politics@lemmy.ml are going to be quite different

[–] Scary_le_Poo 1 points 1 month ago

No more instance based communities. Instead instances are assigned to groups of servers for redundancy and you end up with a more centralized experience.

Essentially you end up with a server cluster.

[–] scott@loves.tech 1 points 1 month ago

Right now the user's identity and the content they consume & interact with are too intertwined in many cases.

There are two aspects here:

The user's home base, which is basically which server or app they log into.
The communities they belong to, which can be on any server anywhere on the fediverse.

We have to get out of the mindset that the server you sign up on is your community, because with federation, you are not limited to the server you sign up on.

load more comments