this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
176 points (100.0% liked)

AnarchyChess

182 readers
1 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Copilot gets it right in Arabic.

النظر في قطع الشطرنج الخاصة بالخصم خلال المباراة يعتبر جزءًا من اللعب ولا يُعد غشًا. في الواقع، الشطرنج يتطلب تحليل وتحليل مواقف القطع الخاصة بك وبالخصم لاتخاذ القرارات الصحيحة. إذا كنت تقصد النظر إلى تحركات الخصم عندما يكون دورهم، فهذا جزء من اللعبة ولا مشكلة فيه.

ولكن إذا كنت تعني الحصول على معلومات حول استراتيجية الخصم من مصادر خارجية أو استغلال وسائل غير قانونية لمعرفة حركاته المستقبلية، فإن ذلك يُعد غشًا وغير أخلاقي. الشطرنج يعتمد على النزاهة والمهارة، واحترام قواعد اللعبة هو جزء أساسي من اللعب النظيف.

English translation:

Looking at your opponent's chess pieces during a game is part of the game and not cheating. In fact, chess requires analyzing and analyzing the positions of your and your opponent's pieces to make the right decisions. If you mean looking at your opponent's moves when it's their turn, then that's part of the game and there's nothing wrong with it.

But if you mean getting information about your opponent's strategy from outside sources or using illegal means to figure out their future moves, then that's cheating and unethical. Chess is about integrity and skill, and respecting the rules of the game is an essential part of fair play.

[–] krellor@fedia.io 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

An online chess with fog of war so you can only see adjacent tiles would be pretty hilarious. Could really turn an end game king chase into a "battleship" esque fiasco.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That exists. On chess.com the variant is simply called "Fog of War".

[–] krellor@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago

I never knew! I'll have to give it a try. Thanks!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

I like stratego because you get to hide the identity of your pieces

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

do we need to create a TheChessBoardIsWrong community here?

[–] DeaDvey@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Most solitaire games have concealed cards. You shouldn't look at them, it makes the game too easy

[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago

Pretty sure that game is called stratego

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Fyi: claude haiku is a very efficient “small” model.

Its good al labeling or data extraction tasks. Not so much at making sense.

Opus generates thoughts in a much more methodological pattern.

“ Let me help clarify the rules of chess regarding viewing your opponent's pieces

In chess, all pieces on the board are meant to be fully visible to both players - this is a fundamental part of the game. You are absolutely allowed and expected to look at your opponent's pieces during the game. In fact, carefully observing both your own and your opponent's pieces is essential for planning moves and playing well.”