this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

Steam Deck

591 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's a video of gameplay on the deck

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

Most overrated game ever.

[–] thingsiplay 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I really love how SquareEnix is putting effort into making their games work well on Steam Deck.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love it everytime I see a big company trying to ensure their game runs well on Deck. Companies caring about performance on a linux device at all is wild.

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On the other hand, it’s a lowest common denominator they can target. “It runs well on the Deck! We’ve done our job.” and the fact that it sold a lot means it’s a market that it’s probably worth the investment (can’t imagine it’s that much) in making a game work. After all any optimization for the Deck also translates into similarly modest hardware being able to run the game…

Not that I complain! Completely gave up on Windows a few months ago lol

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the fact that it sold a lot means it’s a market that it’s probably worth the investment (can’t imagine it’s that much)

Something I've heard is that deck users tend to buy more games and more new releases than your average non-deck user (which makes sense considering most of us are financially well off enough to buy a second PC for portable play). So even though the total number of deck users isn't huge compared to steam as a whole, there's a much more significant percentage of launch purchases that are being played on deck.

Some indie game reported that 10% of their launch sales went to people playing on Steam Deck, which is a sizable market chunk, and a much higher percentage of players than the the steam hardware survey would suggest to expect.

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes sense! And it does track with my own observations of new indie games being more likely to at least court the Deck platform. Do you have an article with those numbers? I’d like to share it with a small developer that might be interested in this knowledge.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The game was "The Pale Beyond"

Here was them saying 10% of sales were on Deck.

Later on, after the game had been out awhile and had some sales, the percentage of deck players dropped to a still respectable 5%.

My interpretation of that is that the Deck users were more likely than non-Deck users to pay full price for the game at launch. Considering that deck users only make up 0.6% of players based on Valve's hardware survey, it would seem like Deck owners buy far more games than the average user.

It's also possible that the hardware survey is underreporting decks though, significantly more decks have been sold than 0.6% would represent, and I know I get far more valve hardware survey requests on my desktop vs Deck, even though nearly all my playtime is on Deck.

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks! I’ll have to find a way to “pitch” this but that’s interesting.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

I’ll take it if that means companies start optimizing their games better.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Well, let's wait and see until the actual release.

The first part of the remake was not exactly a great port (not on the release day anyway).

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

The video is okay, but without knowing the resolution or graphical concessions made, we don't really have a good idea of how it looks.

I really want it to look and run great! Let's wait and see.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is this part 2 of 3 or part 2 of 2?

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago

2 of 2. That's what the "Final" in the title means.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

I think part 2 of 3, but I'm not completely sure.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Definitely not 2/2, could be 2/3 or 2/4

remake ran great on the deck for me too! i played it on the ps5 already but i loved having it on my pc/steam deck so i can bring it with me