this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

150 readers
26 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Donald Trump is returning, artificial intelligence is maturing, the planet is warming, and the global fertility rate is collapsing."

Opinion By #EzraKlein Jan. 12, 2025

from #NewYorkTimes #NYT [gift article - link can be shared. Expires in 30 days.]

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 30 points 5 days ago

Further, in conversation it came up that Mr. Buffett doesn't use any tax planning at all. He just pays as the Internal Revenue Code requires. "How can this be fair?" he asked of how little he pays relative to his employees. "How can this be right?"

Even though I agreed with him, I warned that whenever someone tried to raise the issue, he or she was accused of fomenting class warfare.

"There's class warfare, all right," Mr. Buffett said, "but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."

Source.

That was 2006. We're now almost 20 years past, and I think it's safe to say the world has lost. Regressive oligarchs don't just own countries anymore; they now jockey for global power with each other. They extract resources and "value" without putting anything back.

I don't say this to promote the idea that there's nothing that can be done or no hope for relief, but we "poors" need to accept that our institutions have failed us. Instead, people across the globe are looking to authoritarians to take the reigns in a vain hope that the very people who put them in peril can save them.

The next battle's lines have been drawn. The real question is: what are we going to do about it? Because it's no longer a question of survival under capitalism or oligarchy. It's a question of survival, period.

[–] ErsatzCoalButter 17 points 5 days ago

that's cool how three problems are ones NYT have majorly enabled and the last one is fake

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 days ago
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago
[–] taiidan@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

Same could have been said of the 70s, and the 00's. I guess every 20 years or so we get significant instability. But I guess that wouldn't make a sexy headline for media man Ezra Klein.