this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

retrocomputing

177 readers
1 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure if the article had a point, or if it was just scattered fragments of thoughts.

Regardless, I always felt that the death of OS/2 came later, and was due to IBM's inability or unwillingness to market their products. "We're IBM! People will flock to us and wait for our release schedule!" But it didn't happen, and they lost all of their momentum.

[–] humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@misk I rememeber downgrading IBM machines from OS/2 to Windows 95 and it was a downgrade and a total waste of machines. The driver issues with Windows were a massive pain in the arse.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

OS/2 warp had plenty of driver issues of its own at the time.

[–] humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

@finley yes I know, I worked for IBM

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

Not only driver issues, UI issues. A workmate deleted an image that was being used as a background on the desktop on an office PC, oops presentation manager crashed and it wouldn't boot to a GUI. That was in Warp 3.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago

I had so much hope for this, at the time it seemed to be so much better than Windows, but for me the lack of software was the real killer. I actually still have the install CD sitting here by my monitors. Eventually I switched over to linux because Windows continued failing to impress me after all those years.