I really wonder what the state of OpenAI will be in five years. They really don't have a proper business model (or at the very least a functional one), and it doesn't seem like they will have one. Will Microsoft fully buy them out? It seems like the only way to make "AI" profitable is to make it a selling point on products that would have otherwise already had large profit margins.
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
42 readers
19 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Assuming the company will last 5 years is awfully optimistic.
Aren't they spending like....$2-3 for every dollar made?
But they make up for it in volume!
Wow, this is like the 12 inch single of Blue Monday that supposedly cost more to manufacture than they made on sales. But shit.
It seems Elon is swaying judges these days and has it out for OpenAI. I wonder if Microsoft might use that as an excuse to do something about their relationship.
Will Microsoft fully buy them out?
Yup. They own basically everything anyway, they take the tech, poach the people, lay off 80% of them, and then continue selling copilot in Office 2137 Pro Enterprise Whatever until the end of time
on the first day* of christmas, techbros gave to me: a product that would unlaunch promptly!
*just imagine we are in a world line where the days of Christmas start today, I guess
Skipping ahead a bit:
On the twelfth day of Christmas the techbros gave to me:
- 12 data centers
- 11 metaverses
- 10 whiny nazis
- 9 strictly worse trains
- 8 hallucinations
- 7 AI racists
- 6 busted unions
- 5 EN EFF TEEEEES
- 4 cyber cults
- 3 sex pests
- 2 crypto scams
And a bunch of bullshit backed by VCs.
wait, they couldn't get substation big enough so they're running straight gas turbines just to power this thing? and it's not even CCGT (there would be visible cooling towers unless there's a lake nearby)? i guess they're doing this this way because it's compact and doesn't require water, but they're 1. paying premium for baseline power, more than for regular price from utility, or normal gas plant, and 2. running pollution -> profit machine straight from captain planet episode
reuters article (through neuters, it works like nitter but for reuters) https://neuters.de/business/environment/musks-xai-operating-gas-turbines-without-permits-data-center-environmental-group-2024-08-28/
- running pollution -> profit machine straight from captain planet episode
that is part of their mission statement, yes
to be specific, untreated gas turbine exhaust contains a lot of nitrogen oxides. similar thing (bar particulates) also happens with diesel engines, but usually there's a catalytic converter downstream. venting it like this is also a massive waste of energy because another ~half of power is still recoverable in steam turbine, for example in my city there's large CCGT plant with ~350MW gas turbine, ~150MW steam turbine coupled to it and another ~400MW waste heat is pushed into municipal heating grid. smaller turbines are much less efficient than that