this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37760 readers
49 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Musk says for-profit OpenAI harms public interest—and his own company, xAI.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elon is just mad he didn't think of it first.

[–] Breve@pawb.social 9 points 22 hours ago

No, he did try it back in 2017:

"In late 2017, we and Elon decided the next step for the mission was to create a for-profit entity," OpenAI said. "Elon wanted majority equity, initial board control, and to be CEO. In the middle of these discussions, he withheld funding. Reid Hoffman bridged the gap to cover salaries and operations."

Elmo is just throwing a tantrum because he wanted to be the one to take them private and roll them into Tesla but the rest of the board said no.

[–] starman@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Arkthos@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah it is kind of dumb that you can turn from being non-profit to for-profit if it turns out you've struck gold. Cheapens the value of non-profits everywhere if they can turn that around whenever they feel like it.

[–] Umbrias 2 points 22 hours ago

they didnt strike gold, they are trying to inflict their value crash on the public market. effects will be far reaching, including but not limited to people's retirement plans.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Something something a broken clock

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

It's already for-profit, he just doesn't want to have it called that

Everyone's the asshole here.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Somebody should slap some kind of lock on that dudes cockholster. Sick of reading his name. Never interested in hearing his opinion on anything again for as long as I live.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right now it's an instance of broken clock being right. OPENAi is a nonprofit. Its proceeds should go into further research and the models should be open sourced - like they used to be! Instead they want to milk it as much as possible quickly.

[–] madis@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Okay, I was a bit wrong - they were not REALLY open source, but they had the whitepaper available, they published the dataset, and you could download the model itself, just not the source code. You can find it here

[–] ranandtoldthat 9 points 1 day ago

GPT 1 and 2 were both more open than later releases. However I'm not sure any are fully FOSS.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Consider setting up a content blocker in your browser. This way, all elements that match a specific keyword, get removed.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 27 points 1 day ago

Grifters trying to stymie competing grifts is the ideal use of our throughly corrupt court system. Just the perfect venue for that. It's like an inception of lies and money.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 23 points 1 day ago

So is sounds like effectively his donation was supposed to force them to stay open and develop tech on the cheap that he could then take to use in his commercial systems.