this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
63 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do people store their money in these things? I use Google pay quite often, but it draws the money from the bank at the time of payment

It will give the CFPB the authority to oversee their compliance with federal laws surrounding privacy, fraud, and other rules through “proactive examinations.”

It's to help stop scams, not for people trying to use them as a bank or something.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They need to be insured like bank accounts. Everyone I know that makes less than 50k a year is getting their shit direct deposited to cashapp and using cashapp like it's their bank. If they go belly up in a financial crash, it's going to be like the great depression, but only for already poor folk

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Cashapp doesn't hold customer money. It has banking partners that hold customer funds.

[–] ThemboMcBembo 1 points 2 minutes ago

There's a secondary problem.

If a user has money in their account and the app creator goes under, they lose access but the actual bank hasn't failed. Insurance on the account doesn't kick in because there's no bank failure to mitigate, but the user still doesn't have access to their money before.

These regulations weren't written with banking-as-a-service in mind, and don't hold up well now that it's not a weird edge case but a primary way companies provide banking services.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

like the great depression, but only for already poor folk

Battle music plays

You encountered the purpose of Capitalism!


Fight Bag

Vote Run


[–] DdCno1 3 points 17 hours ago

There being a purpose to capitalism implies that there is some grand plan behind this system. There isn't.

I think you are so terrified by the idea that the world and it's economic system are inherently chaotic that you are coming up with entirely irrational attempts at smart-sounding explanations like this one.

This doesn't mean that there aren't elites exploiting their favorable position in the current system, including in times of crisis that they caused themselves.

[–] tardigrada 1 points 15 hours ago

@themurphy@lemmy.ml, did you even read @dharmacurious' comment or even the article?