this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

230 readers
42 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where’d they go? Larian?

[–] blindsight 9 points 2 weeks ago

Dragon Age: Origins came out 15 years ago. That's a very long time to stay with the same company in the tech sector. It's not at all unusual that there are so few people left who worked with the engine for the first game.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So they can’t get 3 of them to spend a week to write a primer for new devs?

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are probably an experienced team members that are needed on ME5, and management decided that they can't distract them. And these new devs would spend a lot of time figuring out a completely unfamiliar codebase (also creating a proper remaster would also necessitate a lot of low-level changes to the engine which will make it much harder). So it's a business decision, not technical one.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, it’s “won’t” not “can’t”.

Even with zero legacy staff they could assign people to learn/document the old engine if there was enough potential revenue.