this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
247 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1258 readers
105 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Petition Summary: The petitioner calls for the European Union to actively develop and implement a Linux-based operating system, termed ‘EU-Linux’, across public administrations in all EU Member States. This initiative aims to reduce dependency on Microsoft products, ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and promoting transparency, sustainability, and digital sovereignty within the EU. The petitioner emphasizes the importance of using open-source alternatives to Microsoft 365, such as LibreOffice and Nextcloud, and suggests the adoption of the E/OS mobile operating system for government devices. The petitioner also highlights the potential for job creation in the IT sector through this initiative.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 week ago

I've said this a million times, but it's definitely about time we stop spending taxes on a rogue entity across the ocean who definitely does not have our best interests in mind. I'm not convinced it's even legal and I don't understand why the legal prospects have never been brought up about this fucking situation. R&D money should not go to a foreign corporation. In addition, I (and pretty much everyone else on the planet) already paid for microsofts products and services so my government can use it (against my will), so why the fuck do they get away with setting a public price at all? It should legally be free or the governments shouldn't need to pay for it in the first place, and it should legally be open source because it's publicly funded. There are just so many problems with the entire idea of our government using Windows, Office, and their services.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They could call it Eunux!

Oh...

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Eubuntu.

Or Keubuntu, the KDEU spin.

[–] privsecfoss@feddit.dk 28 points 1 week ago

Someone mentioned that M365 is properly not legal. Guess what, it isn't.

The EDPS (European Data Protection Supervisor) investgated the EU-Commissions' use of M365 and found it to be illegal in march 2024. EPDS gave the Commission until December 2024 to, among other things, stop transfers of Personal Information to third countries in M365 outside the EU. Which of course made the Commission sue the EDPS. And MS to do the same..

So M365 is NOT legal to use for any Public Institution in the EU. Unless the Controller make Microsoft change their DPA, contract etc. Kinda like MS did for the Dutch government after the dutch firm Privacy Company made an in depth analysis of M365 and found numerous illegal processing etc.

Fun how Microsoft was made aware of how they acted illegal, and changed it - only for the Dutch Government...!! The rest of their Customers still have the illegal DPA, terms etc... Also fun how it is Common knowledge and IT-departments still choose to use M365, and move as much as possible there from more privacy and security oriented services.

EDPS investigation into the Commissions use of M365: https://www.edps.europa.eu/press-publications/press-news/press-releases/2024/european-commissions-use-microsoft-365-infringes-data-protection-law-eu-institutions-and-bodies_en

My point? EU-Linux is a fantastic idea! 🙂

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is dumb. Hand over development to bureaucrats? create a set of guidelines and requirements, and allow distros to be certified, and fund development of distros that are being used.

[–] halm@leminal.space 32 points 1 week ago

It would make so much more sense to fund existing Linux development than making a new distro, tbh.

If the EU changed to Linux systems and donated the same amount back to open source development as they currently pay for Microsoft licenses, that would make a hell of a difference.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago

100% I can imagine they don't want to rely on third parties to develop their distribution, but, realistically, all the software that keeps the system going will be developed by "randos on the internet" still, so might as well hand over all the development effort to who has the knowledge already, while providing funds/grants

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as the EU doesn't reinvent the wheel, why not? I mean if they are going to fork Linux and rewrite a EU-based linux OS, this would further divide the community and make issues and security a lot more wacky... Not sure this is a good idea.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they're talking about making a distro, not forking the Linux kernel. I don't see any reason why they would need to fork it anyway.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

One reason could be possible US restrictions and sanctions.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Focus instead on enforcing standards' compliance so i can open a .docx with any program and be usable anywhere.

Then focus on enforcing FOSS software in public services but don't bother with a "european linux distro", that's just a waste of resources. There are already a great deal of distros around. Considering geopolitics i'd go with SuSe or some other EU-based distro.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Focus instead on enforcing standards' compliance so i can open a .docx with any program and be usable anywhere.

That's an impossible task. Not even Microsoft manages that. Do not want to count how often i used libreOffice to repair or convert an older MSOffice file so it can be opend with modern Versions of MSOffice.

Once there was a 500MB Excel Sheet with lime 500-1000 used Cells, opened and saved it to.a xlsx file using libreOffice and reduced it to a few MB while still being fully functional.

[–] jnk@masto.es 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@ShortN0te @0x0 I mean the real problem here is that MS office is a mess but somehow still standardized, so "enforcing standards" would be as easy as showing MS the middle finger and using libre office. They'd save a lot of money and time, it's a clear win-win scenario imho

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Open standards are the first step of a functional transition to an open government. From there Open Source Software can compete against commercial software, once the ppl see that the FOSS offers the same features then the proprietary paid software they can easily switch to it. With open standards they only need to train the users, no data to migrate etc.

[–] halm@leminal.space 5 points 1 week ago

Focus instead on enforcing standards’ compliance

For sure, but ¿por qué no los dos?

Completely agree with your other prioritisations.

[–] ptman@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago
[–] stphrolland@mathstodon.xyz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

@JRepin

just an idea, it could be based on #NixOS , if I remember well the project was partially funded by European Research or Opensource funds.

Please correct me if I am wrong on the fundings, I say this from distant memory.

EDIT: it was just an idea, as it is not the most user-friendly distro out there...

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago

Or they could use a distro that's already been created by a European vendor, maybe even create a competitive tender. There's no point in creating a new distro, add a new repository if you must.

Well, what better way to embrace FOSS than dismissing the efforts of all the existing distro maintainers? Welcome to the community, guys. Good luck building your cathedral next to the bazaar!

How about they instead work together with the distros and create a way of certifying a distro as gov-ready?

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Fucking over microsoft is always good

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

It's not fucking over Microsoft, it's prevent Microsoft from fucking us over. Microsoft is not the victim in this.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Especially in light of Microsoft CoPilot. You do not want obvious spyware on any computer.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

Don't forget Recall, aka literal spyware, taking screenshots of your device regardless of whether you're entering passwords, making private searches, using TOR, opening sensitive documents, looking at private pictures. It's all exposed.

[–] Frederic 8 points 1 week ago

Just use Debian, it has old root, stable, still being developed, it's the base of various others distro that "enhance" it (sometimes badly).

Debian.

I'm using MX Linus AHS, based on Debian, BTW.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

PSA: You can sign the petition even if you're not a European national. I registered and signed as a Canadian myself and it accepted it

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Exists already; OpenDesk

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd really like to see this. However I don't have high hopes when looking at the current state in Slovenia, where Microsoft is deeply rooted in all public and non public sectors, starting from schools. Most know only Windows and Word while they don't distinguish between the two and schools system doesn't give a shit about teaching anything about computers let alone non Microsoft. One of the reasons is, of course, teachers being computer illiterate or ... know only Microsoft. And so on and so forth.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

This is education everywhere

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ain't no way that's getting accepted. It's like asking to completely destroy and rebuild one of the EU countries.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're already putting out a petition so they're not wholly against the idea of an EU-Linux.

Also, this has been done before by other governments, like parts of the UK's and many Indian governments.

I think it'd be a big step, but a doable one and for the better.

Why do you compare it to destroying and rebuilding one of the EU countries, if I may ask?

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do you compare it to destroying and rebuilding one of the EU countries, if I may ask?

Because destroying and rebuilding the digital infrastructure is very similar. It's extremely expensive and causes a lot of breakages in the process.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

most software is web based and OS-agnostic so there is no destruction and rebuilding happening, and for everything else, FOSS is literally free. How is it expensive to switch from X with a monthly cost to X that is free? Even if things breaks initially, the cost would equalize and long-term be considerably reduced.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

most software is web based and OS-agnostic so there is no destruction and rebuilding happening

I don't think EU backend and government job software is OS-agnostic.

and for everything else, FOSS is literally free

Yes but they need to switch and develop new utilities which is time and money.

Even if things breaks initially, the cost would equalize and long-term be considerably reduced.

That might be true depending on the maintenance costs of the new solutions.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

" Number of supporters: 141" and 375 upvotes, something doesn't add up.

[–] kaugman@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks but no thanks.