this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
375 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

231 readers
151 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 6 days ago
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 30 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Flounders are not bilaterally symmetrical.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

In the tree of life, flounders are a sub-sub-...-sub-species of bilaterally symmetrical animals: https://www.onezoom.org/life/@Holozoa=5246131?otthome=%40_ozid%3D1&highlight=path%3A%40Apionichthys_finis%3D3640785&highlight=path%3A%40Bilateria%3D117569#x2913,y-2310,w8.2796

Edit: let me preemptively be a pedant to myself and say that "sub-...-species" is wrong because "bilaterally symmetrical animals" is not a species. Flounder is itself a species AFAIK, not a sub-species of anything. It is a descendant of the common ancestor of all bilaterally symmetrical animals. There, now surely no one will find anything to be pedantic about :D

[–] azi@mander.xyz 6 points 6 days ago

Just like starfish!

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I appreciate that information. However, flounders themselves are not bilaterally symmetrical. I have caught many dozens of them and it's pretty easy to tell that they are not.

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Flounders are born symmetrical; eye migration happens as they transition to the juvenile stage of growth.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Oh, I know. It's very interesting. But when people imagine a flounder, they generally don't imagine a juvenile unless juvenile has been specified.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Forego the illusion of species and families. It's taxa all the way down.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago

It depends on whether it was a larvae or not.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

They're "differently symmetrical."

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago

What if you take off the costume? Humans aren't entirely bilaterally symmetrical (at least not on the inside) and obviously not radially symmetrical so the paradox continues.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 days ago

What about phylum neutral bathrooms?

[–] azi@mander.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

Echinoderms:

[–] harl3k1n@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

TIL sponges don't do punctuation.