World News

9 readers

1 users here now

News from outside of Australia

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

deadcat@aussie.zone

A third-party candidate could cost Kamala Harris votes in a key state. It might be enough to hand victory to Donald Trump | ABC News (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by zero_gravitas@aussie.zone to c/worldnews@aussie.zone

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd argue Kamala Harris is costing Kamala Harris votes in a key state.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

The only correct take to have.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

I guess but taking action against Israel is not really consistent with her election strategy of winning over Never Trumpers.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it a third party, or is it refusing to stand firm against genocide?

[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Come on man it's status quo genocide or Trump accelerated murder.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Or... one side choosing not to support genocide...

Why isn't that an option?

Edit - And don't get me wrong. I'm not from the US, but I'd still vote Democrats in this election if I was, because they have other policies that would impact me more directly. But either way it's disingenuous to blame the party offering to denounce genocide as the issue, when the only real options both support it...

[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is that option but I doubt you have the stomach to pull that lever in the voting booth.