this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
81 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
63 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's been talk of this unauthenticated RCE vulnerability coming with a CVSS 9.9 rating but none of the technical details were publicly known until it was made public just now at the top of the hour. Simone Margaritelli discovered this vulnerability and has shared a write-up around this potentially very impactful Linux vulnerability.

This vulnerability, fortunately, doesn't affect the Linux kernel but rather CUPS... The print server commonly used on Linux systems and other platforms.

...

From Attacking UNIX Systems via CUPS, Part I:

"A remote unauthenticated attacker can silently replace existing printers’ (or install new ones) IPP urls with a malicious one, resulting in arbitrary command execution (on the computer) when a print job is started (from that computer)."

...

This remote code execution issue can be exploited across the public Internet via a UDP packet to port 631 without needing any authentication, assuming the CUPS port is open through your router/firewall. LAN attacks are also possible via spoofing zeroconf / mDNS / DNS-SD advertisements.

Besides CUPS being used on Linux distributions, it also affects some BSDs, Oracle Solaris, Google Chrome OS, and others.

As of writing there is no Linux fix available for this high profile security issue. In the meantime it's recommended to disable and remove the "cups-browsed" service, updating CUPS, or at least blocking all traffic to UDP port 631.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had a moment of actual laughter.

I was expecting a kernel issue handling networking connections or SSH or who the fuck knows but... cups?

Printers, they ruin everything.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Loads of complex code exposed to an assumed trusted network is the model of printers. They’re going to be full of security issues.

This stuff should be sandboxed and then never, ever exposed to the Internet.

I'm always befuddled how these things end up public on the internet. (I'm not really.)

Like, it's not like the printer is the one poking holes in your firewall while you sleep.*

*If it is, then you should feel great shame, throw away anything more complicated than a pair of dull scissors, and get a job digging holes then filling them back in.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

the reporter is a real asshat, judging by their twitter.

first: twitter post about the vuln, "disclosure is happening in less than two weeks", "i got patronized because the devs can't accept that their code is crap"

"id rather just drop it and force them to fix it asap"

then, later:

"disclosure is happening at 20:00 utc"

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep. Also claimed "it affects all GNU/Linux" while it only really does CUPS and so on.

Just alone full disclosure is a shit thing to do. Do not even mention the part where it was intended as a responsible disclosure.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Ya I was worried this was going to affect something like OpenWRT and a lot of shit was about to get fucked over. CUPS? 99.9% of people are gonna have that port closed on their router. Sure this is important to fix but a 9.9? Nah

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember when printers were connected by a USB cable?

Also, sudo ss -tunlp to see what ports are listening on your system and which applications/services use them. (Linux)

ss -K closes dead ports

If you didn't explicitly open a port, ask why it needs to be open (listening). (25, 22, 67, 53,5353)

Make sure what you did open is opened at the right addresses. Ie localhost, 0.0.0.0, 127.0.0.1, etc for the purpose.

Use a firewall and block ALL incoming traffic.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

The Firewall will not help you in this case

[–] pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So if Cups is properly sandboxes this is less of an issue? Still not good but not show stopping

I don't think this is 9.9 worthly

Update:

You can use this to get a shell as the lp service user

[–] andrewd18@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] andrewd18@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not according to RedHat, who I trust a hell of a lot more than a Phoronix article that cites a blog post.

CVE-2024-47176 cups-browsed (7.5)

CVE-2024-47076 cups-filter libcupsfilters (8.2)

CVE-2024-47175 libppd cups cups-filter (7.7)

CVE-2024-47177 cups-filters foomatic (6.1)

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Cups-browsed-eez nutz!

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago
[–] drwho 3 points 1 month ago

This is a big nothingburger because it doesn't have a cute name, a marketing campaign, or a silly logo. /s

[–] progandy@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hmm, never had cups-browsed enabled as I do not need network printing with LDAP or legacy cups. Discovery using DNS-SD/mDNS and driverless printing work perfectly fine without it.

I am not sure if the driverless discovery ever can generate a PPD with arbitrary commands.