this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
19 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While vote to topple his government has failed, it signals a new series of tests for the prime minister.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fucking garbage article and headline.

Here's one for you: "Poilievre's non-confidence motion falls flat in parliament."

Or perhaps...

"Conservatives fail to force favourable election schedule."

Or maybe something simple:

"Christofascist takeover bid fails."

I'm not a big fan of Trudeau - ESPECIALLY since he fucking reneged on electoral reform - but compared to the fuckwits in the CPC, I'll hold my nose and support him.

(In reality, I'm in such a tory-blue riding that I'll probably vote Green, because my MP will still get 70% of the popular vote).

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah media outlets need to start saying "Conservatives bring up this week's false outrage, moral panic and pearl clutching"

[–] Presently42@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Why not ndp?

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Fucking garbage article and headline.

You got me to read the thing, just to see what could possibly be so offensive about it. It's a pretty good summary of the situation for an audience that might not be too familiar with Canadian politics. Don't blame the messenger.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If he wants to weasel out of the mess of his own doing he better remember his promise of electoral reform and pass proportional representation with the other parties.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

The other parties can table this too can't they?

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's completely stupid and only plays to the most powerful and wealthy elite in this country ... no matter if they are Liberal or Conservative

The Liberals will keep promising things like proportional representation but never deliver on it .... they'll keep pandering to leftist ideals just enough to sway voters but never enough to follow through. They'll keep playing the game of hoping that everyone will not go with Conservatives while balancing themselves to leaning right enough that no one will notice.

I'm Indigenous Canadian and I grudgingly support the Liberals because they have done a lot for Indigenous Canada. They could do more but they always seem to hold back on everything ... giving us just enough to keep us from completely revolting against them. We also know that the alternative of the Conservatives would mean we Indigenous people would lose just about everything we've gained in the past decade (which sounds like a lot but it isn't .... to non-Native Canada, any gain we achieve always feel like too much).

In all, like every other first world country .... we don't exist in a democracy ... we exist in a plutocracy or oligarchy where only the wealthy and most powerful people get to direct our national politics. People don't have a say ... those with money do.

Always has been

Always will

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree with your comment as first nations communities should be getting $300 billions of investment from the federal government as the peoples have been through a lot.

Though I believe Justin Trudeau hasn't promised proportional representation as it was was his father Pierre Trudeau who talked about it a lot. Justin Trudeau focused on the promise of electoral reform as he was trying to push for the alternative ranked choice vote system however he and the other 106 corrupt elites in his party voted against creating a citizen's assembly as the committee could've recommended a system under Proportional Representation that could've be MMP or STV.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

It's the "always will" where I disagree. This society we've built isn't anything close to sustainable no matter how much lip service is given to the idea that it should be. What can't go on forever, won't.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At this point, PR would significantly help the Greens and NDP, and harm the BQ and Liberals badly. The LPC has no interest in doing this. They're not altruistic. Remember, they forced an election in the heat of the pandemic in order to consolidate power.

They have also proven to be totally uncommitted to top line promises. I don't really see how they're a party worth voting for.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

However all the MPS from the BQ have voted in favour of electoral reform on motion m-86 and have stated that they support Proportional Representation. It’s the 107 and 111 corrupt liberals and conservatives who voted against a citizens assembly on electoral reform.

Source: https://lemmy.ca/post/28858201

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

It would be cool if they killed politicians if they don't survive