this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

41 readers
23 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Brownlee, who will take us through “mind-blowing demonstrations of AI’s capabilities,” is a curious addition — he’s previously complained of his work being stolen to feed AI. But a big enough check is a pretty convincing counterargument. [Twitter, archive]

I’m disappointed but not at all surprised Marques is involved in this. I think he was caught by surprise by how popular his mildly AI-critical videos were, and this is him doing damage control and trying to get back into the grifters’ good graces.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

his production equipment is way too expensive to be making videos critical of tech

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I mean honestly 200-proof Yud is a bit much for me too. Probably a bit much for most people.

As someone who likes bunnies and sunshine I'm not even sure why I'm drawn to this forum so full of darkness but I just can't look away.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like to think of it as concentrating that draw of the void into someplace less irony-poisoned and openly destructive than many of the alternatives. This way I can avoid spreading the despair into the rest of my life.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

(in the voice of Zoidberg taking careful notes) "Avoid ... spreading ... despair ..."

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’d love to defend Oprah for her Blackness or her being a woman but she’s a billionaire.

The untold insane wealth. It’s like being a cop. No matter who you were before, the unchecked power renders them all the same.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Horrible people are horrible people. Oprah has been an enabler of corruption and scams for as long as she's been popular.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Article kind of covered it all. Not much I can add other than I can't wait for all these apps to pull back their pointless ✨ buttons

One thing I'm curious about is much of a mainstream trend signaller / kingmaker Oprah is these days.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago

She's still a go-to for celebrities who want to be seen as telling raw, difficult truths; Harry and Meghan obviously being the flagship example. They're surely trying to piggyback off that here.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

That's a good question. But certainly she still provides significant hype.

[–] jplebreton@mastodon.social 5 points 2 months ago

@dgerard Matt Damon Super Bowl "fortune favors the brave" moment. hopefully (if unscientifically) that means similar downfall timeline.

[–] HotGarbage@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

Did ABC get AI credits to air this? Are they going to use said AI to justify laying off staff? Then use that money to pay Oprah?

[–] istewart@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

Aww, how nice, Sam got his hair done professionally. And they gave him the Nimoy cut!