this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

82 readers
5 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Air to air heat pumps are amazing. I'm completely converted, they are fair superior to gas.

But why the UK is pushing do hard for air to water is a mystery to me. Seems like betting on old inferior technology.

Also I don't get why they aren't pushing for a induction also conversion and disconnecting the gas line to the house entirely. Induction is magic, that is a way superior technology to gas cooking.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The big reason somebody might want air to water is that it enables a low-cost retrofit of an existing heating system which uses water to distribute heat. Definitely not what I'd choose if designing from scratch, but I can see how it makes financial sense in a lot of homes.

And yes, induction is amazing, but there are a whole bunch of people who have been marketed into treating gas stoves as their personal identity.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think most of those retrofits aren't cheap because the pipes and radiators aren't big enough for the colder water. So it ends up needing a whole now install anyway.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can see how that could happen for some homes. Worth doing the calculation though, since it can be cheaper if the pipes are adequate.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

It's probably always cheaper. The government is pushing for air to water. There are no subsidies for air to air which I think is a better way to heat a home.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

why the UK is pushing do hard for air to water is a mystery to me.

I was a little confused when I followed a European forum. The transition to heat pumps has been a big deal, lot of discussion in the UK and Germany. It had a bunch of people talking about boilers and having heat pumps heat water, which confused me. I'd only heard about boilers in the US much in the context of large buildings with old steam heating systems.

In the US, I've seen plenty of air source heat pumps. Some water source heat pumps. But they both are used to heat (or chill) air, which is then blown into ducting and circulated through the house. Provides ventilation and such and humidity control. But it seemed to be overwhelmingly the case that people in Europe were talking about heating water and circulating that.

Small window or through-wall air conditioning units do obviously heat air, usually for one room. Split minis move refrigerant, which ultimately heats or cools air.

And it seems like you'd rather have ducting, as it can provide control over a given ratio of fresh air to an area of a building and filter it.

I was able to find a few companies in the UK dealing with ductwork, but they focused on new office buildings.

I eventually figured out what was going on.

A lot of houses in the US were built after the introduction of air conditioning. Not only that, but the US has more areas that get quite hot than Europe, so once air conditioning was an option, people really wanted it. The result is that a lot of US housing was built with central air conditioning.

This meant that when houses were designed, ductwork was built into the design.

Ducts are relatively-large. It takes a lot of space to move a given amount of heat.

It is not easy to retrofit ducting into an existing house. You have to have this big thing jammed into the house somewhere that runs to all rooms.

Water is much denser. If you use water to move your heat around, you don't require that much space. So if you retrofit an existing house, you don't have to mess the house up. Not only that, but a lot of buildings in the UK had apparently already been set up with systems that heated water with natural gas and then moved it around the building to heat it, so putting in a heat pump could use that existing system.

My guess is that people did the math and decided that it didn't make sense to massively go rip up existing houses when they could stick comparatively-unobtrusive additional water pipe in.

My guess is that what will happen is that new buildings will incorporate ductwork, so there will be a very slow transition to ductwork. But it won't happen overnight, just as buildings age out and are demolished.

The current transition to heat pumps that they're doing is on a much shorter timeline than that.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The air to water thing is huge in the Netherlands too. I think it is because it's the traditional way of heating the house. So people looking to replace it will want the same thing.

It's even so that the word heat pump only is used for the air-water units, not the air-air ones, those are called airconditioners.

We changed to an electric boiler and air heat pumps, and have archived quite the reduction, certainly when the gas price went sky high.

But there is a lot of resistance to the idea.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

It's even so that the word heat pump only is used for the air-water units, not the air-air ones, those are called airconditioners.

The names and tech all overlap and it gets messy. But you can certainly buy an ac unit that doesn't heat. Hence why I specified heat pump, it is a heat pump.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

On the other hand, using a heat pump for replacing a hot water heater is definitely a good thing. Using a heat pump on an old water radiator system may not work well. Friends had to replace a gas heater for their water radiator system and were told that there wasn’t a heat pump unit hot enough for the retrofit.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh yea. I've been in houses (outside the UK). Had heat pump water tank and an air to air heating (and ac) system for the house.

I've always wondered if you could have an air to water system that fills the tank for the taps and then heats the radiators. But also have supplementary heating air to air. Maybe a big one downstairs in the hallway or in the main room of the house.

But with the UK it always comes back to having the worst insulation in the world. Fix that and we wouldn't even be discussing heating systems.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But with the UK it always comes back to having the worst insulation in the world.

Most of the UK has relatively-comfortable temperatures, so the impetus to add lots of insulation is relatively low.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_the_British_Isles

Temperatures do not often switch between great extremes, with warm summers and mild winters.

The British Isles undergo very small temperature variations. This is due to its proximity to the Atlantic, which acts as a temperature buffer, warming the Isles in winter and cooling them in summer.

Over here, in the US, the places with the lowest temperature variations are also islands, like Hawaii. Extreme temperature swings happen in places like the Dakotas, far away from the ocean.

You've been cursed with fairly comfortable temperatures. :-)

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

Oh, and one other factor. I was just reading a paper on British housing policy. I'm not taken with the format -- it's imagining a world where planning restrictions on building new housing were reduced, and talking about the benefits of it -- but it does also make a number of good points, including the point that some of it is that the UK hasn't been building housing at the kind of rate that would probably be ideal for some time. Since newer buildings are better-insulated, that also means that the present stock of buildings tend to be less-well-insulated than would be the case had more construction occurred:

https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/IEA-Discussion-Paper-123_Home-Win_web.pdf

Although this was not initially the motivation, there have been environmental benefits as well. For a long time, Britain used to have poorer energy efficiency standards than most neighbouring countries. It is not that all British homes were energy inefficient. It is just that Britain used to have the oldest housing stock in Europe (European Commission n.d.), and the energy efficiency standard of a dwelling is strongly correlated with its age (ONS 2022). Rejuvenating the housing stock has therefore accidentally driven up its average energy performance.

This is the "the paper is from a potential future looking back at the imaginary past" format talking here.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago

In Australia, we have followed the British housing tradition and have really bad insulation too! We are working on fixing it but there is so much to retrofit.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Friends had to replace a gas heater for their water radiator system and were told that there wasn’t a heat pump unit hot enough for the retrofit.

This generally means that they'd need to upgrade their radiators to accommodate a heat pump at normal temperatures.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Sadly that was not the advice that they got.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

I’ve been considering getting a multi unit airco (the warms)

For heat pumps I’d need to replace all my radiators

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They'd get a lot more people onto heat pumps if they didn't block grants on any unit that can cool as well as heat.

Even then, I think I'd still want gas to heat my hot water. The electrical system can't cope with doing that on demand. I used to have a hot water tank, and I'm not going back to that. Combi boilers are so much more convenient.

Heating systems can afford to be slow though.

I'm pretty sure I saved more than this 30% (which given it's in a headline, is going to be an absolute best case scenario) by going to Agile Octopus.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago

As someone fitting solar to a small boat.

Both is an option. IE have a water tank that can heat water on lower power slowly. Making use of reusable energy. And a heat bump to efficiently use it. (Not really doable on a small boat)

And fit gas (i use electric) instant water heaters at the taps. I have it set up that I can turn it on and often use if when connected to shore power in winter.

But use a tank heated by a solar dump when possible.

Given how cheap solar panels are now. (£69 for 410w panal plus shipping) if your able to fit stuff yourself. It is worth the effort.