this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
11 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jimmyjamxoxo@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

A little too late Justin. You let corporate greed rule your policies when it comes to immigration and foreign students without working out the strain it qould cause elsewhere in the economy. That is the absence of governing not good government. PP and conservatives will be the same if not worse!

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I know that my opinion on all this is not popular, and I usually keep it to myself especially where immigration and students are concerned since, lets face it, the hate for them can be unreal, but in this case I feel compelled to say I feel like this criticism is unfair.

The government is dealing with many real problems at once, and federal government policy impacts often have incredible lag time , meaning you can't just keep making changes every quarter without risking a lot.

With immigration, the Fed was (and in some cases still is) responding to real worker shortages, slowing population growth, and generational change and retirement. Real problems that need to be solved, and immigration is a solution to it. Some of the changes were actually humanitarian changes to reduce TFW exploitation and abuse. Meanwhile, the fed have no control over interest rates, little to no control over global inflation, and we exist in a federal system that separates powers and responsibilities which not only limits what the federal government can do but guarantees any perceived overstep will be challenged in court by at least 2, if not more provinces.

They've been governing, you don't have to like it and many people don't consider all the factors that go into these decisions, but it isn't fair to say they've been absent.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Federal government has the means and responsiblity to persuade and cajole provinces in certain directions when it comes impacts of policies they are implementing. They could have foreseen the housing shortage or the unemployment or the depressed wages with the immigration, foreign workers and foreign student programs they are creating, because that's what the hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats in various government agencies are for - to plan and study all the freakin impacts- but didn't foresee it or chose to ignore it, having faith in the "markets" to solve needs of the economy. Alas, the "markets" are slow moving and not efficient at all.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's more difficult than you imagine to persuade provinces to go along with them, almost anything that might infringe on provincial jurisdiction is going to be challenged by at least Quebec and Alberta. I also don't believe we, here in 2024 with the benefit of hindsight, can fairly criticize the government for not foreseeing how the last few years have gone.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not automatic that provinces will follow the Feds. But the Feds have sticks and carrots to motivate provinces. It's politics. What provincial government wants to be seen BLOCKING a federal program to create more housing? That's one of the sticks - politics through the media.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 months ago

Certain provincial governments have developed a tendency to scream "but jurisdiction!" about any federal policy that might affect them, whether or not it's useful or justified to do so and regardless of what other stimuli are applied.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Federal government has the means and responsiblity to persuade and cajole provinces in certain directions when it comes impacts of policies they are implementing.

I'm not going to defend Trudeau. Not on any front.

But this is a bad take. Any federal government taking a take-it-or-leave-it approach to the provinces is attempting to operate as a dictatorship, and it's something that should be actively resisted or rejected.

The problem right now is that there are a lot of Conservative Premieres, and they can taste blood in the water, so they're circling and stonewalling.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

responding to real worker shortages

I have to disagree. And I'm as left as they come by the way. I don't blame immigrants for wanting to come her to make a better life. I blame the corporations for taking advantage of that and the government for rubber stamping LMIA applications.

We'll take my little nothing town for example. Swift Current, Saskatchewan. According to the LMIA map available here, we have 84 approved temporary foreign workers, mostly in coffee chains, convenience stores and gas stations.

Meanwhile, as a retail manager, I get five or six resumes a week from people who are either a) naturalised immigrants b) Canadian by birth, or c) folks who have just recently finished up their own TFW "contract" for lack of a better word.

So the way that LMIA works is that the business owner "applies" to the federal government and makes the case that they need to get a cheap overseas labourer because there isn't any local person available to do the job. So in a town of 15000 people, there aren't 84 unemployed people looking for part time work? I know for a fact that that's not true because I get them applying here all the time.

The fact is, these corporations apply for an LMIA because they don't have to pay them more than the bare minimum for an "x" amount of time. Then when that time comes up, rather than giving our raises, they don't give them raises, forcing them (who are now effectively naturalised) to go find another job, freeing the corporation up to apply for ANOTHER LMIA, which gets rubber stamped.

Like I said, I'm as left as they come. This country is made by it's immigrants. It's rich because of our multicultural history. Immigration is a great thing. Hell, I'm a first generation Canadian. But the temporary foreign worker program is just a way for companies to use indentured servitude to create a "service class" made up of immigrants.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you believe Justin Trudeau is reading this right now or does it make you feel important to pretend to be speaking directly to him?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think you’re asking in good faith, so I believe OP doesn’t owe you a response. But I think you’re being a rude jerk.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Good thing no one asked you eh?

Because if they did they would be a fucking idiot because you aren't OP, and probably shouldn't be asking third parties for 1st party opinions. ;)

[–] Templa 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You are being unnecessarily toxic and honestly we don't need this kind of behaviour on the fediverse. People are allowed to have different opinions.

Edit: I just want to be clear that I do not agree with OP's commentary at all, but there are better ways to disagree with people.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just want to be clear that no one, especially me, asked you either.

[–] Templa 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for making me laugh, I do hope your day gets better!

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I do hope you go from laughter to sadness expeditiously and never recover. :)

[–] pbjamm 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You have proved the comment correct wrt your rudeness.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Oh no! Whatever will I do?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is this the Liberals deciding, a bit late in the day, that the best way to take on the Conservatives is to imitate them?

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Libs have been centrist and pro-business for sometime now. While other liberal governments had balanced policies between pro-business and social responsibilities, this liberal government seems to have exuberantly responded to business wants when it comes to labour needs. This is the mess we have here.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

The Liberals have been unambiguously pro-business since Cretien. It's just which businesses have been the focus of their support that's changed somewhat over time. Neoliberalism has been at the heart of the party since the Red Book.

The current administration has been throwing all of its support behind big city "businesses businessing businessly" businesses. Think of Bill Morneau and his family enterprises, or anything B2B where it seems like something the client company could just do on their own, but they gain a lot of connections by working with the other business.

You know. Rich people bullshit.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Are you joking? Conservatives love TFWs; I guarantee the owners of places that employ most TFWs are right wing. They get to take advantage of them for however long, paying them shit wages and refusing to respect their labour rights.

Clamping down on TFWs is good for Canadians, both immigrants and those born here.