this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
99 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically title. Do you know of any companies that use desktop Linux?

I can think of two in my area in Brisbane - Adfinis and Red Hat. Both have a pretty small presence here from what I last heard (several employees each).

My employer allows the Linux team to use Linux but it's discouraged and our lives are made somewhat difficult.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Local here. We all use Linux desktop. Libre office. Gimp. Krita. Inkscape. Vscodium. Thunderbird. Sublime. Etc etc. We have a programmer who favoured Windows. We finally converted him. Now we only have the mac laptop to deal with having to do osx builds.

[–] humanplayer2@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We have both Linux and Windows machines in my team. We do all the work in Linux, and register hours in Windows. We also all have iPhones that we only use for 2FA.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 months ago

We also all have iPhones that we only use for 2FA.

That's some expenses right there.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 20 points 2 months ago

register hours in Windows. We also all have iPhones that we only use for 2FA.

Without background information that sounds kind of insane. Switching to alternative time tracking software and getting YubiKeys or alternatives instead for 2FA would've saved so much money as well as time every day.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Where I work,~2,000 employees and contractors, I'm almost certain I'm the one person using Linux (Fedora) and refusing to use Windows (so they deployed a cloud Windows 365 instance for me to have access to the in-house platform).

I'm blessed to hold a position for which the company would have a really hard time replacing me, I think that's why they haven't booted me (chances are they will at some point, but I don't care anymore).

It still blows my mind how the IT team tries to justify being locked into Microsoft, and then telling me I could potentially become a point of vulnerability, when my system is easily the most secure in the whole company and my habits make for little to no possibility of ever exposing anything outside of the company.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

how the IT team tries to justify being locked into Microsoft, and then telling me I could potentially become a point of vulnerability

Because they can manage and control all the windows PCs , pushing updates automatically, restricting what users can do locally and on the network, they have monitoring tools and whatever antivirus and antimalware tools they have, and are able to easily manage and deploy/remove software and associated group licensing and so on and so forth.

Meanwhile you're a single user of unknown (to them) capabilities that they now have to trust with the rest of their system, basically.

The first rule of corporate IT is, "control what's on your network". Your PC is their concern still, but they have no effective control over it. That's why they're being a bit of a pain in the ass about it.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I get the philosophy behind their actions and intent. They can audit that cloud PC all they want. In my computer, I'm lord, god and king, nobody gets to see what happens there but me and those I want to.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago

Yep, and to the person justifying the IT department's invasion of privacy: they've been lying to us for years, there are breaches ALL THE TIME. Workers will give up every right in the face of corporate excuses? 🤷‍♂️

[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So they are gaslighting to cause you to have doubts. So they are using a psyche which is a symptom of them having unrestricted access to your time and ears

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hostpoint, one of the largest hosting companies of Switzerland uses Linux Desktop Clients.

[–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago

In 3 of my last 4 jobs as developer I could use Linux as desktop. The 1 exception did not have the admins that could think ahead of what Amazon or Microsoft has told them. They where also struggling with other 'modern' ideas.

Maybe a German thing, but Linux for a dev is quite common here.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago

In my team we use both Linux and Mac (I don’t want to disclose my company, but it’s in Sweden). IT isn’t entirely happy about some of us using Linux because it’s more difficult for them to administer the computers (i.e. install spyware), but so far they’ve been unsuccessful in making us switch.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In my experience, the larger the company, the more likely they are to force you to use Windows. The smaller companies will be more relaxed about the whole thing.

The largest company I've worked for that allows Linux had a staff count of hundreds of engineers and hundreds more non-nerds. In their case though, the laptops were crippled with Crowdstrike and Kollide and while the tech team was working hard to support us, we were always aware that we made up around 1% of the machines they manage and represented a big chunk of their headaches.

The response to this you usually hear (from me even) is that "I don't need support, I know what I'm doing". Which is probably true, but the vast majority of problems is in dealing with access to proprietary systems, failures from Crowdstrike or complaints about kernel versions etc.

TL;DR: work at a small company (<100 staff) and they'll probably leave you alone. Go bigger and you'll be stuck fighting IT in one way or another.

[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago

Yes. At one employer, we had an entire domain in our AD forest that was Red Hat / CentOS / Ubuntu workstations for the developers.

[–] d15d@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

we can decide ourselfs if we want mac, windows or ubuntu (no other distro allowed). Our code runs in docker containers and except for the IDE our tools are web-based for the most part anyway, so it doesn't really matter which OS you use. though I heard there were quite a few issues with docker and Mac when the first M-chip Macs were used. it's a software company in Germany with ~150 people.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago

I work for a major network infrastructure company. We can choose from Windows, macOS, or Ubuntu for work laptops. I chose macOS, but I'm probably going to switch to Ubuntu with my next laptop refresh since a lot of our internal tooling works better on Linux.

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When I was working for Averitt Express, a trucking company out of Cookeville, Tn, our yard trucks had computers in them (for yard and dock management) that ran Ubuntu. This was 10ish years ago.

[–] theroff@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's awesome - great to hear about Linux desktops bring used by non-techies especially in a company.

How was it received out of interest?

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago

They didn’t care. You know non tech folk, they don’t care so long as it works. If you’re lucky, they know enough to hit the button with the power symbol to turn it on, but make sure you have step by step instructions printed out for those that can’t figure it out. I wish that was sarcasm.

In our location it was mostly used for passive tracking of equipment via a scanner on the roof of the truck and tags on the trailers and we didn’t use the software much beyond that. From what I saw of it, it was some native custom application. Used the default Gnome interface and design scheme of the time. Looked to be pretty idiot proof.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I Sysadmin in education here in Brisbane. Half our server stack is Linux on a Nutanix hypervisor. I do all my work from Linux, my junior admin recently moved his workstation to Fedora KDE, I use Kinoite.

The student and staff devices are 95% Windows, manager doesn't care what we use to administer. Officially we're a "Microsoft School"

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's sad you don't teach students about Linux instead because Windows is getting worse and it's pretty bad already.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

I just build what they need, networks, auth, security etc -I'll leave teaching to the teachers

I work for a web host (UK based). We're entirely WFH so as long as you can support it yourself you can use it. They don't care what Distro we use.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

google and nvidia both do.

i don't know if it's still true; but they gave their employees 2 computers where their workstations were usually linux and their laptops were either linux or mac if they were engineers. it was their choice to decide what to get; but they usually went along with whatever their peers where using; except for non-engineers who always wanted macs no matter what, even if their windows machines were newer and better by miles.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My work use it in a limited capacity.

We primarily use Windows but some also use MacOS and some use our internal Linux spin off Ubuntu. With some internal tools and all that.

The Linux users are primarily developers and a few Linux admins and I'm pretty sure the Linux platform is maintained by a developer.

[–] candle_lighter@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Can't say what company, but a large company that provides education tools has been looking into ways to be less dependent on Microsoft. They have some of their employees currently using Linux computers right now. Some employees in the IT department still need a second Windows computer.

[–] wasabi@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

The vast majority of devs at my company uses desktop Linux (Ubuntu LTS). Though admittedly our IT department would prefer if we all used Windows.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I used Linux for work. It was fine until we migrated to O365 from workspace. I've found enough workarounds that no one complains.

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lots of arcade games and other amusement machines made in the last twenty years run on desktop Linux.

Incredible Technologies games, Raw Thrills/Play Mechanix Big Buck Hunter Pro, Arachnid dartboards, and TouchTunes jukeboxes off the top of my head.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

Every company I've ever worked for

[–] andrew@radiation.party 3 points 2 months ago

Lowe’s uses a customized Linux distro for their department terminal computers. Most of what you do is in browser or terminal applications, if genesis is still in use.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is there a law that prevents employers from docking someone's salary by the expensive proprietary software you opt-in for, instead of using a free option?

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

What an awful take. "Free as in freedom" includes not being docked pay for your software choices.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What? No genuinely which company is docking employees for using unfree software. If anything it's the opposite.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know of any, but I'd like to see it.

"Want to use Windows and Office? Here's the bill."

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That would genuinely make sense though, proprietary software (especially paid proprietary software) costs more money for any company then open source software. Windows needs more maintenance then an ultra stable Linux distro like Debian or even an LTS release of Ubuntu or Fedora. Meanwhile Microshaft ensures that any document made with office doesn't look the same unless it's viewed with office.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

No, it doesn't, because the cost of that software is on the business because it makes them money. This person is literally smoking crack if they think it should ever be on the employee. There is never, ever, ever a situation where an employee paying an employer is a good thing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My last 3 employers have let me use Linux on my work laptop, I've gone with Ubuntu each time, it has worked really well for me. I'm lucky that I get to use Linux since I work as a web dev, it often matches production more easily that way.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago

Many such companies

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Current company's full windows, I use both as does the software I maintain. Retail/POS software.

Previous company used linux for trading. Fintech.

Previous previous used linux solely (well, my team did): Ubuntu for devs, product ran on modified Slackware. Large scale retail/POS.

[–] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Opengear in Brisbane; development teams often use Linux.

[–] alfenstein 2 points 2 months ago

Some public places like libraries here in Denmark use Linux on their computers, but I don't know to what extent.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I'm a contractor and I use linux if that counts :D

[–] compcube@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago

I've noticed that some "mobility" startups are using Linux. E.g. companies working on electric or automated vehicles.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I think they are a bit harder to manage

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That's either BS or FUD, pick any two. Stick to a specific distro and train your staff and there's no reason for any IT personnel to find linux "harder to manage".

Users grumbling it's harder to use might be a different matter.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

Stick to a specific distro and train your staff

Linux is Linux. Train your staff to properly use one and they can use them all. "Distro" is just a fancy word for "which package manager and update cycle to we chose and what logo do we put on our pre-installed wallpaper".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

My company uses Ubuntu on a few products they sell to customers, but it's only a relative few devs that use desktop Linux as a daily driver.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›