This is why Godot is so important and that source available can be something the EU has to consider for all newly designed games. Sorry, small, mid and big time game studios, and screw you publishers, what we need is to make sure that the barrier to entry for game developers is significantly lowered. What, you think I'm taking about video game conservation? Leave that to AccursedFarms.
What I'm saying is that you can more easily pitch games to publishers, using assets and engines that are already "standardised", like Bethesda's several Rube Goldberg machines, if they are available. I'm looking at Fallout London as saying to myself: why isn't this on Steam, Switch, and every other platform Fallout 4 can run on, being sold by Bethesda?
Even split prices, one for people who already owned Fallout 4, one for who recently purchased Fallout 4 if they don't have Fallout 4 - if you wanna be pedantic. But the point remains the same: these lovely modder devs, though they shouldn't be forced, could have pitched this game to Bethesda, even as an "off-universe" game. Whatever.
But then we remember the Fallout 76 Store. Oh my god, no. And DMCA takedowns, claims of copyright infringement - even though "modified works" doesn't exclude software - and what about actual live services and competitive games? Like could the community make the server instead? Can it be something even the Olympic Committee has a hand in, so the game can be vetted for the Olympics?
Like update your EULA. "May be used, modified and deployed for free if it's used for education and development purposes". I'm not a lawyer, so take them scribblings with a grain of salt, but something like that would really just add an extra level in participation in schools, clubs, organisations, etc, even as an easy way to recruit and receive games and new worlds, for free.
Free the engine! Free all of the engines! NOW!!! "The secret sauce" fallacy has been stupid, is stupid right now, and will continue to be stupid into the future - unless we do something about it.