this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
13 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 19 points 2 months ago

It'd be cooler if we had more trains, but I'm down for cheaper EVs in general.

I just wish it was easier for renters to find a place to charge because that's the largest barrier to my family getting one. Also we have relatives a few hours away that we visit fairly often, maybe once a month, and there's only one charger on the route (and it's sort of out of the way).

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

Woah, big if true!

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

while we do need competition and variety on the market, electronics with Chinese origin raise serious concerns though. given China's present political trajectory it's not too far fetched to assume that vehicles will have remote backdoors that could be used for remote control of a vehicle. So unless those are "dumb" vehicles (which is highly unlikely) this is unlikely to be a good thing in a long run

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The threat that chinese EVs pose to north american consumers has been vastly overblown by paranoid US nationalists and protectionist automakers who don't fancy the competition. I'm not saying the chinese government is amazing no notes, just that this is a nothing issue.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

@droopy4096 In addition to this, it's well-reported now that several American automakers share vehicle acceleration data with insurance companies, so drivers are being monitored without their awareness and could face a hike in insurance fees if they're detected as being a little too reckless in the passive acceleration data monitoring. I haven't heard of any non-American automakers doing this. And while the consequences of the "Chinese government shutting down all EVs in NA via some electronic backdoor" are greater than this, one is speculation about the future and the other's current fact

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish that cars in general had fewer reliance on electronic systems though, and some non-critical modules could be optionally disabled by the owner without rendering the car inoperable..

[–] sonori 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In my experience you can typically just pull the fuse for the cell transmitter is you don’t want the vehicle phoning home, though they annoying tend to rely on the radio module for things like carplay and radio so it’s not a perfect solution.

Some manufacturers rely on the same module for the key fob though, so some research is required.

Definitely wish it was just an option in settings, but i’m not sure I would trust it if it was.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

More physical kill switches in electronic devices would be nice in general.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you pronounce the company name? Is it "bid" or B-Y-D?

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

In Chinese it's ζ―”δΊšθΏͺ which sounds like Biyadi [insert fancy Winnie the Pooh meme here]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYD_Company