Enlightenment was such a cool window manager. Shame the development pace was (and still is) slow and it never really took off.
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
1258 readers
82 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I think even Samsung was funding it for a while. They took a long time building libraries supporting rendering on X11 what I remember. I used the 0.16.x version with my 1GHz Athlon years ago, it was very cool.
Is there even someone left?
I only tried it around 2008 or so and it was extremely slow paced back then while looking like the interface from a sci-fi movie.
There are still some people doing commits but I think the original devs have moved on.
it's definitely progressed a lot since 2008, but the last couple of years have been extremely slow
You don't update the perfection
having support for the newer wayland protocols in the wayland session wouldn't hurt
Text rendering sure has come a long way. Those topic links look absolutely horrendous.
I ran enlightenment for a long time. It was great.
If there was an updated version these days i'd be fully inclined to run it, haven't followed the project in more than a decade though
I ran Storm Linux for a short while in about.... 2001-2002. Got it on a CD in a misc pack of disks from some Linux distro vendor.
It was supposed to be a server oriented distro, secured more than others, and ran Enlightenment for a desktop. Overall, it was a reasonable distro, but didn't gain enough general support and devs to keep it up and running. The group behind it folded after a short while.
I have to say these desktops look to damn confusing
What are you confused by?
There are way too many bars that look like dockable windows, the stuff at the bottom. Lots of stuff looking like decorations (but in general these buttons are confusing af even macOS is better than that.
And at the top it looks like the whole desktop is a window with decoration??
In general low contrast, too many strange thin things, no clear icons.
This is a screenshot of window running a VM, so yes it is a window running a whole desktop. The top window decoration, menu bar, and the very bottom panel are not part of the old desktop, but rather from the modern host system.
I agree though, it is confusing. Main problem (and I remember this) is that this is Gnome with Enlightenment as a wm, and Enlightenment had aspirations to be more than a wm. So there's some duplication of effort there, and no integration/communication between the two projects (Gnome in the next version used sawfish/sawmill as wm, which was more coordinated with Gnome).
Enlightenment has/had its own toolkit, which you can see here in the DOX window, which is different from Gtk. Enlightenment also has a bunch of widgets, like the top bar and the stuff in the bottom corners, which are non-Gnome and clash with and are on top of the Gnome panel. The desktop icons are also zero pixels under the Enlightenment top bar, which suggest the people responsible weren't coordinating at all.
Interesting! This explains a lot, thanks!
Happy to be a Linux user in 2024!
Of course I am not talking about Windows ;)