this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3925 readers
1 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hirom 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Which would mean it's possible to destroy PFAS in sewage, before it reaches water supply.

Now, let's require plants to pay for PFAS treatment for their sewage, if they use or are found to reject PFAS.

Polluters should pay the bulk of the cleanup, not the taxpayers.