this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
178 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
61 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
178
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Full article click here

click for explanation of what the four categories are

We must strategically focus on a relatively smaller number of carefully selected companies and products for maximum impact.

Many of the prohibitively long lists going viral on social media do the exact opposite of this strategic and impactful approach.

We have split these targets into four sections:

1. Consumer boycott targets - The BDS movement calls for a complete boycott of these brands carefully selected due to the company's proven record of complicity in Israeli apartheid.

2. Divestment and exclusion targets - The BDS movement works to pressure governments, institutions, investment funds, city councils, etc. to exclude from procurement contracts and investments and to divest from, as the case may be, as many complicit companies as practical, especially arms companies and banks. We rely on the following authoritative sources:

  • AFSC list of companies that have provided Israel with weapons and other military equipment used in its #GazaGenocide.

  • AFSC Investigate database of companies enabling the occupation.

  • UN database of businesses involved in Israel’s illegal settlement enterprise.

  • WhoProfits database of Israeli and international corporations profiting from the ongoing Israeli occupation.

  • Don’t Buy Into Occupation list of businesses involved in the illegal Israeli settlement enterprise in the OPT in which European financial institutions have investments.

3. Pressure targets - The BDS movement actively calls for pressure campaigns against these targets. This includes boycotts when reasonable alternatives exist, as well as lobbying, peaceful disruptions, and social media pressure.

4. Organic boycott targets - The BDS movement did not initiate these grassroots boycott campaigns but supports them due to these brands’ complicity in Israel’s genocide and apartheid against Palestinians.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

One good thing about being poor is that you don't have to worry about where your money is going, because you never had it in the first place.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

virgin bougie lefty: boycotts starbucks because instagram told them to

chad downtrodden proletariat: boycotts everything because they can’t afford anything more than basic food and housing

disclaimerthis is a meme if you are boycotting starbucks for their shitty behavior in relation to Gaza and unions i totally support <3 just jokes đŸ«¶

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 months ago

Nice but why is a can telling me this?

[–] Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Wait, I work at McDonalds, and don’t really have any other choices, everywhere else either pays too little, I quit, or I was fired. So what do I do

[–] themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

these boycotts are mainly about avoiding buying from these companies, not working at them.

if you do wanna help though, you can try to waste as much of their money as possible, for example by slacking off or giving customers extra food (of course if this is your only means of living not getting fired should come first)

I’m actually looking for a different job already, they’ve been cutting my hours, and one of my friends overheard the managers saying that they want to fire me because I’m “too slow” disregarding my disabilities

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 13 points 6 months ago

boycott activism is about inflicting economic loss on the business by abstaining from purchasing goods and services. while boycotts can sometimes entail employee action, it is never expected of you to take action that would result in harm to you or your family. take care of yourself first so that you have the power to fight for others ❀

[–] TripDawkins@lemmy.studio 3 points 6 months ago

I believe in activism for important causes, but even I think it would be best to stay right where you are because your departure would, imo, have little impact. If I were there, I suspect I'd stay quiet and try to focus on what I must do to bring about my next upgrade at McDs, somewhere else, or something I made on my own. I imagine at McDs it's possible to get in a "zone" where you and the tasks become one or something like that. I worked at Wendy's, but never achieved the "zone" because I wasn't there long enough to see how the operation's various pieces came together to make the whole thing work. Best to you.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

like id ever need more reason to boycott fucking hp, or mcdonalds and such.

on a semi related note i hate that there are very few, if any, corporations not involved in actively making the world worse somehow. just let me exist without funding some genocide or something and having to keep track of all these brands on which one is the least fucking damaging.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What if instead of a bunch of companies all at once, we just got a few million people to join a "strategic boycott club" or whatever we'd call it, and just go one company at a time, just for a month... Like, okay June 1st 100 million Americans say they are going to not buy anything from McDonald's for a month unless McDonald's immediately does xyz... I bet just the threat would tank their stocks. It's easier for the average person to just think about and execute on one thing at a time. Then once McDonald's gets the message, move on to the next company

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 6 months ago

that’s certainly a thought.

as a non-expert, my understanding is that the list posted here is one aiming to strike a meaningful balance between brevity and breadth across industries. from the linked article:

We must strategically focus on a relatively smaller number of carefully selected companies and products for maximum impact. We need to target companies that play a clear and direct role in Israel’s crimes and where there is real potential for winning, as was the case with, among others, G4S, Veolia, Orange, Ben & Jerry’s and Pillsbury. Compelling large, complicit companies, through strategic and context-sensitive boycott and divestment campaigns, to end their complicity in Israeli apartheid and war crimes against Palestinians sends a very powerful message to hundreds of other complicit companies that “your time will come, so get out before it’s too late!”

Many of the prohibitively long lists going viral on social media do the exact opposite of this strategic and impactful approach. They include hundreds of companies, many without credible evidence of their connection to Israel’s regime of oppression against Palestinians. Many do not have clear demands to the companies as to what we expect them to do to end the boycott, making them ineffective.

be sure to read through the linked article for a full breakdown of how it defines its strategy for maximizing effectiveness and each individual target.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Any direct action ideas to take against some of these companies.

Anything from minor inconveniences to actual criminal acts I’m down for.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Dude missed Meta

[–] TheSaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People of conscience around the world are rightfully shattered, enraged, and sometimes feeling powerless about Israel’s #GazaGenocide.

Pulled from the linked article
 i can’t help but fucking laugh at how tasteless that # is

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 months ago

eh i dunno. social media has proved to be a powerful tool for mobilizing.

i get how on an aesthetic level if you are used to seeing tags used for “trends” or “drama” it can come off wrong, but i wouldn’t come down on them as tasteless.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

oof, I didn't know Carrefour was complicit in the Gaza stuff 😓

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

Thank you! This is helpful.

[–] cosmic_cowboy@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago

Maybe a dumb question, but what is the difference between a consumer and organic boycott?

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I kind of expected to see Starbucks here. Have they cleaned up their act?

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 6 months ago

it’s not on the official BNC list for now, though certainly a valid popular target for the shit it did to its union over a pro-Palestine post. i wouldn’t be surprised if it appears in that bottom right box sometime soon but for now i guess the BNC finds it is not as significant or likely to evoke change of a boycott as the others.