this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
147 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

149 readers
28 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you're an American, and you want to stop Trump, it's important to be actively involved:

  • Check your voter registration - there's been an active effort to purge voter rolls, and if you moved or changed name, you'll need to register again anyways
  • Talk with people you know about voting for Democrats up and down the ballot. Personal endorsement matters.
  • Volunteer — it makes a real difference
  • If you can afford it, donate to the Biden campaign. Even fairly modest amounts of money from a lot of people add up to being able to hire staff and run ads.
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redfox@infosec.pub 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't mean to downplay the environment, but I think we'll have a long list of worries... 🫨

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 months ago

This is a c/climate, so we're talking climate. Lots of other reasons to prefer Biden over Trump (and to avoid third-party candidates)

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

And none of those other worries will matter when you starve to death because we fucked our ecosysten which we get our food from.

A lot of those worries are worries exactly because they divide and distract people.

Abortion was resolved in the 1970s... Until politicians found they could win votes and divide people by putting the right for a woman to have control over her body into the discourse; demonizing people and lying about abortion being baby killing is a great way to control people.

Migration, economy, even healthcare will all be fucked if we dont address the climate.

Google climate refugee, dengue fever climate change and climate disaster costs if you dont believe me.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 9 points 7 months ago

At risk of by chance being somehow miraculously reached? The climate goals will soon be as dead as the polar bears.

[–] pkill@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

continued existence of capitalism does that already

[–] downpunxx@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago

"could" ffs

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But he might bring about the complete collapse of the US... which would result in less emissions.

Try to be more optimistic!

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Funny joke, but fer serious...

A complete collapse of the US wouldn't mean a carbon free utopia, it would mean corporations would be the defacto government (they already pretty much are, but we still have weekends and pollution control. Megacorps will turn everything into the mining towns of old where everyone is completely owned by the mining companies and pollution controls, labor laws and healthcare are non-existant.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I was just being fatuous.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mcrfpus2&f=m let's petroleum production as at a near all time high. Let's not pretend Biden is doing a bang up job on climate. We need more seats in Congress on top of the Presidency to make meaningful change.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He's not perfect, but petroleum is only part of it. What he's done has been to put in place the policies which will enable future decarbonization

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's better than Republican policy, but it's not where it could be with a representative further left on the spectrum.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

That would only work if there was a majority for left-wing policy. Simply having a president who's further on the left would not actually change that much of they have to find compromises with people who don't care about the physical reality.

[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Tell everyone you know in Michigan to vote. The rest of us barely matter

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago