this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
148 points (100.0% liked)

196

664 readers
52 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
148
R(ul)evenge USA edition (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

The discourse on American politics sometimes devolves to "Leftists who won't vote" & "MAGA Republicans" teaming up to "getting revenge on liberals".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 6 months ago

If you aren't familiar with Project 2025 there's a good video deep dive here: https://youtu.be/dk7sCJalxAo

MAGA wants revenge and it isn't limited to just liberals.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 34 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I'm shocked and dismayed to see "Protest both candidates by telling them you'd be okay with either" on 196 of all places.

If you don't vote for Biden, Trump is gonna win. You guys know that, right?

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 months ago

Yes but what about the horrible things Biden is doing that Trump will also do plus a fuckton more?

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tell the DNC to get their head out of their ass?

[–] Whattrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because that totally worked in 2026 right? They obviously just need to lose to Trump and they will suddenly realize the error of their ways and become a full leftist party overnight. All we need to do to save America from the evil DNC is let Trump win again! It makes perfect sense!

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago (7 children)

You seem mad at ME because THEY don't give enough of a shit

I've been saying it for MONTHS. If they run biden they WILL lose.

I do not WANT them to lose, I am just informing you of the outcome babe.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Gather around for a personal story.

The year was 2015 and a friend who lives in a school bus visited town. We were all smoking weed in his bus and he said "Oh please let Clinton loose". I asked WTF are you thinking? And he responded that he spent lots of time protesting and that it didn't work because people weren't listening. It seems no matter how many terrible fascists get elected, liberals still won't listen to him.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Liberals never pay attention to popular protests unless the talking heads on TV tell them to.

I lost my faith in American "Democracy" during Occupy Wall Street, when the national media completely shut out any of the actual demands being made in favor of a "they don't even have any goals" narrative.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I still remember how well that propaganda worked on people. It became commonplace for liberals to complain that the OWS protests were aimless and lacked message.

I still see them repeating that shit!

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Even when liberals are shown protests on TV, they often walk away with the wrong message. It seems the only time it doesn't happen is when the state uses violence in a way that is indefensible.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 9 points 6 months ago

And even then it's down to a coin flip whether they'll care.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 points 6 months ago

I protested at the DNC years ago with an anti-war group. Liberals won’t listen to anything that even remotely pushes them out of their comfort zone. They’d rather keep voting until something magically changes (it won’t), or they waste the rest of their time criticizing you for “allowing the right to win.”

I have to say, it’s pretty fucking annoying to be scolded by liberals that do nothing but fill in a circle, while you’re doing things like marching to protest war, writing articles, participating in things like Food Not Bombs… meanwhile, they are in a state of malfunction because you refuse to vote for one of the two right-wing candidates propped up in front of us by the ruling class so we can do the same old song and dance again while thinking something will be different this time.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Did his protests get more attention under trump?

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

He doesn't protest anymore, but I get your point. As noted elsewhere, the protests got more attention because the responses were more violent. Is that good? Considering how the police have even more money than before I am not so sure...

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

~~loose~~ lose

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

"Revenge"?

Vindictiveness doesn't have anything to do with it, I just can't bring myself to vote for genocide.

If anything, it's resignation and apathy as everything I predicted back in 2016 continues to come to pass.

Trump is going to win in November because the Democrats care more about preserving their AIPAC financing than representing their constituents.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Okay then vote against genocide.

Donald Trump is Genocide at home and abroad.

Joe Biden is "only" Genocide abroad, and probably less of it.

Therefore, a vote for Joe Biden is a Vote against genocide.

No, it doesn't matter that he's an active participant in the apparatus that's creating the genocide, because if he's in office there's less genocide. Which is the important part, and pretending otherwise is sophistry. By abstaining from voting, you are increasing the likelihood of more genocide, if you discourage others from voting, you are an active participant in the overall social apparatus that is probabilistically increasing the ammount of genocide.

The utility calculation is dead simple: more votes for Biden in key states makes more genocide less likely, and discouraging people from voting for Biden makes more genocide more likely. Therefore, discouraging people from voting for Biden is a pro-genocide strategy and voting for Biden in battleground states is an anti-genocide strategy. I live in a solid blue state, so I reserve the right to vote third party, but I will also encourage other people to vote for Biden.

You should vote for Biden unless you live in a solid blue state, and even then it's not a bad idea.

[–] within_epsilon 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Offering a sandwich with more and less peanut butter when I am allergic to peanuts still means I will be sick. I'm hungry and I want a sandwich with no peanut butter. There are third party candidates providing sandwiches with no peanut butter. I am sorry demand decreases for the sandwich with less peanut butter, but I am unable to stomach peanuts.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Alright, but it's not really about you, is it? There's untold many hungry people, some of which are allergic to peanuts, and the only crate left has nothing but.

There are several people needed to open the crate. Maybe it can be opened without you, maybe it can't maybe it's stuck regardless. But even if you don't want peanuts, it's incredibly selfish of you to not only refuse to help feed the people who can be fed but also pretend to be of upstanding moral character when you do so. So take an antacid and show up at the ballot.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's untold many hungry people in the world because our comfort depends on it. In fact, what a wild metaphor to continue using when there's thousands starving to death in Palestine right now with our tax money. Hey, but at least we'll get cheap oil shipped to us through that new India>Saudi Arabia>Palestine trade route that's being set up as a competitor to the "new Silk Road" thing china is doing. Cheap oil might be that peanut butter sandwich that people over here need to stay financially afloat, but it's only a few layers removed from your actions being responsible for genocide. Some people don't like this fact and would rather we had actual representation in our government.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

because our comfort depends on it

That's not actually relevant to the discussion; dismantling the United States, capitalism, and/or all imperialism isn't on the table.

If you want to have a birthday cake, and you see Timmy about to start playing with a loaded gun, you should still stop that from happening even if it doesn't get you birthday cake. That's especially true if there's no birthday cake readily available.

Edit: the more I think about it, the better an analogy this is, because if >!little Timmy blows his brains out after you chose not to stop it, it seriously hampers the ammount of birthday cake you eat in the future. Because if there's birthday cake available you probably won't be able to eat it after that, people will be less likely to invite you to a birthday party, and little Timmy won't have any more birthdays.!<

CW: casual discussion of graphic and dark topics.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] within_epsilon 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There is a flaw in making a collective choice individualistic. Helping others is a moral thing to do and I was there in 2020 even though peanut butter sucks. Individually, I will get a sandwich, probably with peanut butter.

However, this crate landed on Palestinians. Helping the people under the crate seems important.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OKRainbowKid@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Voting for a sandwich without peanut butter will result in other people deciding what sandwich you get, and the only realistic options are those with peanut butter.

Also, you'll have to eat the sandwich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Okay then vote against genocide.

Okay, then put it on the ballot.

Therefore, a vote for Joe Biden is a Vote against genocide.

No, it doesn't matter that he's an active participant in the apparatus that's creating the genocide

On the contrary, I think it matters very much.

By abstaining from voting, you are increasing the likelihood of more genocide, if you discourage others from voting, you are an active participant in the overall social apparatus that is probabilistically increasing the ammount of genocide.

By voting, you are prolonging the existence of the United States and guaranteeing that the genocides it supports will continue. You have made yourself an active participant in reifying the implied consent of the governed that entitles the government to act on your behalf, and with your consent it will continue to ship weapons to apartheid regimes.

The utility calculation is dead simple: more votes for Biden in key states makes the governments' dealings with the Israel appear legitimate and discourages people from taking meaningful action which might alter that relationship. Therefore, discouraging people from voting is an anti-genocide strategy.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

By voting, you are prolonging the existence of the United States

Sophistry. Half the U.S. doesn't vote in elections, and they're still a global super power. Whoever told you that is an idiot.

makes the governments' dealings with the Israel appear legitimate

More sophistry. The government's legitimacy isn't brought into question by a lack of votes; your actions are no different from someone who is simply politically disengaged and apathetic.

Keeping quiet isn't an effective component of destroying the United States. Engaging in this argument the way that you are is a pro-genocide strategy because you are increasing the probability of more genocide.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm much less concerned about the hostility of those who openly demand genocide than the inaction of those who merely pretend to oppose it.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

Strong "at least they're honest about it" energy

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The worst thing I could wish for you as a person, is that this comment follows you around for the rest of your life.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

The complaint is about duplicity, not an acceptance or exoneration of those who openly agitate for it.

An ‘ally’ who goes along to get along, but has a radically different value set is not an ally. “9 people sit a a table with a Nazi and say nothing - how many Nazis are at the table?” We decry the Russians who don’t speak out against Putin, but shuffle uncomfortably when the DNC’s top candidate is pursuing a path that enables atrocities?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

Gives me an idea for a new meme to cover the other half:

"Leftists who won’t vote" 🤝 “Democrats” agree on being “apathetic”.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I won't vote for Biden. The DNC has known that for months and has decided to do shit-all about that fact.

Socialism 2024 has my vote, and that IS still a vote

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're not the main character

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

Tf does that have anything to do with this lmao

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Fundamentally, nothing will change."

-and then it didn't

Now, here we are. Again.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Don’t abstain or vote third party to get revenge on vile liberals.

Do it because you have a backbone and can spend your time better doing almost anything.

load more comments
view more: next ›