this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
147 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

628 readers
1 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 48 points 7 months ago (12 children)

The World Health Organization recognizes videogame addiction as a disorder, and the American Psychiatric Association says that the question of whether or not videogames can be addictive is "still being debated," but that "early evidence suggests that videogames are one of the most addicting technologies around

Its clear that games can be addictive and the concept of „whale fishing“ is openly discussed in terms of game design. Obviously, the weakest of us in terms of addiction make the standard because its those who are harmed.

Obviously, cash shops should be banned in games immediately.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Obviously, cash shops should be banned in games immediately.

Upvoted specifically for that last part.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They try to make balantro a 18+ game because it resembles a card game. Meanwhile fifa is for 3+ year old and it's just a card oprning game where they fish money from some sad football fans and children. I have no faith in anyone in charge of that

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago

I have to think part of this is just all the ancient representatives we have. They've lived long enough to know what gambling looks like, and what good ol' sports ball looks like, and by golly nobody can tell 'em any different!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 38 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Some of these are engineered to be addicting especially loot crates and stuff. A lot of them are just genuinely good.

They mention Minecraft, pretty sure that one was addicting since day 1 and completely unintentionally so. It's just genuinely fun and you can spend hours in it easily. Same with Factorio.

Not exactly a new phenomenon, I've seen my own parents up at 4am just because they wanted to sneak a peek at the new level they reached. My mom had hand drawn and annotated the entire Zelda 1 map. For a little bit, that NES basically ran on a UPS to not lose their progress.

For some reason US parents always want to shift the blame to companies for their own failures. It's her own damn fault she let this get out of control for 10 fucking years. Just like those that park their kids on an iPad all the time and then sues because their kid spends too much time on the iPad and cry out in the news how iPad babies are so bad. Who's given them the damn iPad?

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago

I think there's a core difference between loot boxes, which is out and out gambling, and gameplay. Both can be addictive, but they have very different consequences.

Gameplay addiction steals your time and maybe your social life, but that's it.

Gambling addiction also steals your money. And when that's gone, drives you to extremes trying to find more.

[–] EddyNottingham@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Concerning Minecraft, as I know the game it seems fine, playing Java on a survival server I run for friends.

However, I wonder what the experience is for the other millions of players, on Bedrock, highly popular monetized servers, etc.

What crappy casino-like techniques are used to monetize Minecraft in those contexts? I really don't know as I'm in my own Minecraft bubble, but I'm sure there are lots of examples as it's such a monumentally large game.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hyper monetized minecraft servers can be reeeeeeally bad but i wouldn't say the offline play is designed to be addicting in the way that most modern AAA games are

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fine tuning a gameplay loop so people keep playing (and maybe spending money) isn’t as far from designing something to be addicting as most people would like to think. Hence why gaming and gambling addiction dovetail so well.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think you’ve got some valid points but you’re completely ignoring how countless corporations have invested collectively probably trillions of dollars over decades into how to best reach and sink their talons into us.

Minecraft may be an “accidentally addicting” product (though I’d somewhat dispute it), but iPads sure aren’t just addictive by accident. No tablet is. They’re designed to be from the ground up, like every major social media app and then some.

Parents need to parent, but to act like any of us are on an equal footing with the Facebooks of the world is to completely misunderstand the imbalance of power here.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I know a kid that is really into multiplayer Minecraft on Xbox and he is always after his parents for more Xbox cards so he can buy different skins and texture packs. Servers like Cubecraft and The Hive must be making a lot of money.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

The thing about older games and Minecraft being addictive is that it's sort of fine, because they don't benefit financially from it so obviously it was unintentional and just because of the entertainment.

It becomes a problem with these new games when they are subscription based or have lots of microtransactions because the more addictive the game, the more money the company makes.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

In some respects, I can see this. Games such as unscrupulous MMOs are often carefully engineered to distort your ability to manage time and money. However, many games are still produced as entertainment products meant to compete on a basis of artistic or entertainment value. The addictive aspect doesn't come from a manipulative design, but Rather just plain old fun, and in those cases similar arguments could be made about strawberries or books.

I would like to reiterate that there are addictive video games which really do try to manipulate you. Just like how a breakfast cereal might market itself as healthy and balanced while loaded with sugar and deceptive portion sizes, leading to unhealthy habits, a money first video game will contain elements carefully crafted to distort player's perception and reasoning.

It's just... All mixed together.

[–] Dagrothus@reddthat.com 6 points 7 months ago

Gamers can understand this. Casinos understand this. But how do you articulate the difference to a court or actually legislate against it? FOMO is usually used in a predatory way, like with daily rewards. Paid random lootboxes are definitely predatory, but other rng systems can be genuinely fun. Not an easy problem to solve without stepping on toes.

Dailies are probably something that could be solved with targetted legislation. Harmful to player mental health just to boost stats for investors. Some games need to limit progression, but there are loads of ways to do so other than dailies.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I know people tend to joke about having a Civ addiction, but the number of people who have in fact binged an entire night or more playing civilization and have experience addiction like relationships with it should tell you that the line is thinner than I think most people are comfortable with.

Few games are “just good old fashioned fun.” Every game is designed to draw our attention. The distinctions between intent/accident, “it’s just fun”/designed to be addicting, etc. are not always very clear.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago

There's a difference between addictive and entertaining.

I wouldn't call nicotine entertaining.

Opening lootboxes you paid $5 each for is not entertaining.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 10 points 7 months ago

Well, apparently we can

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And now explain to me, what psychological tricks Minecraft uses that make you addicted to it.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

One is multiple parallel goals. Makes it hard to stop playing, since there's always something you just want to finish or do "quickly".

Say you want to build a house. Chop some trees, make some walls. Oh, need glass for windows. Shovel some sand, make more furnaces, dig a room to put them in - oh, there's a cave with shiny stuff! Quickly explore a bit. Misstep, fall, zombies, dead. You had not placed a bed yet, so gotta run. Night falls. Dodge spiders and skeletons. Trouble finding new house. There it is! Venture into the cave again to recover your lost equipment. As you come up, a creeper awaitsssss you ...

Another mechanism is luck. The world is procedurally generated, and you can craft and create almost anything anywhere. Except for a few things, like spawners. I once was lucky to have two skeleton spawners right next to each other, not far from the surface. In total, I probably spent hours in later worlds to find a similar thing.

The social aspect can also support that you play the game longer or more than you actually would like. Do I lose my "friends" when I stop playing their game?

I don't think Minecraft does these things in any way maliciously, it's just a great game. But nevertheless, it has a couple of mechanics which can make it addictive and problematic.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The social aspect can also support that you play the game longer or more than you actually would like.

This is the part of any online game I absolutely hate. The feeling of being even slightly beholden to someone else, like now I have to think about them having a good time too.

Games that forbid direct communication, and allow you to drop in and out of a match without hurting others feel a bit better in this respect imho

[–] millie 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that more of just part of interacting with people, though?

Like, if you play some kind of real-life game with no regard for anyone else, that's generally considered poor sportsmanship. That wasn't invented in online gaming, it's been a concern as long as people have been coming up with games to play together. We accept that if you sit down and play a game of chess or golf or pool or D&D or paintball, you're going to try to not cheat or blow the game off or be a jerk about it. Some people are better sports than others, but the general idea is that we accept the wins and losses and the game going in different directions, because otherwise there's no game.

What's an aberration is this concept that people you meet with over an electronic connection aren't real, don't matter, and are never owed anything.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What's an aberration is this concept that people you meet with over an electronic connection aren't real, don't matter, and are never owed anything.

What you said is all true, but what I'm saying is precisely the opposite of this. I don't like playing certain games with others because I empathise with others and want them to have a good time.

So I usually avoid games (video and otherwise) that are designed so that my continued enthusiastic participation are required for the enjoyment of others. To me, that doesn't feel like play; it feels like work.

I'll do it, but it's exhausting. Maybe it's an introvert thing, because I'll come away from those games feeling completely drained.

Note I'm not saying those games are bad, just that i hate them. At least, if my social battery is already used up for the week (which it usually is just from regular life).

[–] millie 2 points 7 months ago

Ahh, that makes sense!

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

In the case of Minecraft the issues you listed are pretty much present in almost anything entertaining, video games or not, including in-person events and social functions.

As with anything moderation is key and people just need to learn not to let it control them. Some people are incapable of that though.

There are definitely certain things that game companies need to avoid doing but multiple goals, a little bit of luck, and online cooperative play is not it.

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

This is the same as Trump saying he was just challenging the results of the election.

Namely, nobody is trying to prosecute him for his legal challenges...and nobody is complaining that games are too entertaining. They are bold strawman arguments that most people see through immediately. "Complete bullshit" is now a common argumentative tactic.

[–] thingsiplay 2 points 7 months ago

Heisenberg approves this.