this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

47 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lugh@futurology.today 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

These tests confirmed, it is claimed, that key technological hurdles have been overcome to allow the reactor to be sent to space

Lockheed Martin in the US is also working on similar tech.

Interestingly, they refer to this as 'expandable' to the size of a 20-storey building, yet capable of being launched on a rocket. Presumably, most of it will be some scaffolding or lattice-type structure for the heat-sink elements.

If the Chinese or Lockheed Martin researchers pull this off, it's bye-bye to the idea of SpaceX's Starship for Earth-Mars travel.

Considering how long nuclear fission reactors have been powering submarines and large ships (that started in the 1950's) it's strange it's taken them this long to get to space, where they have such obvious advantages over chemical rockets. There's no indication when this Chinese reactor will be tested in space though.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 9 points 11 months ago

it's strange it's taken them this long to get to space

It's not too strange considering how little most of society cared about space beyond Earth's orbit. Even the last of the Apollo missions were met with little fanfare outside of the space industry.

The billionaires' dick measuring contest and other countries beyond Russia showing actual progress in their own space programs have finally kicked up enough competition to get some aspects of the Space Race going again, including investments in newer technology.

I've heard for every dollar spent on space it benefits the US eight times over.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sounds a bit overkill to make the "continuous power supply for at least 10 years" if your trip is just 6 weeks.