this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
677 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

421 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 168 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Save us, EU. You're our only hope. Sincerely, USA

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Actually probably not. Not without major concessions. The pound will have to go which they will never accept unless they have absolutely no other choice

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The concessions are the same as for any other EU member, which is fair

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why does the pound have to go?

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Because countries that join nowadays have to adopt the Euro. Denmark, for example, joined when that was still allowed, so they still have their DK.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago

Apparently it's dependent on the signing of a certain agreement before a certain date, which the UK did sign, so it's actually debated on whether or not Brexit made that signature null or not.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah I'm confused about this statement... There's several EU countries that don't use the Euro, like Poland and Czechia.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 6 points 8 months ago

Some joined when the rules stated that you could choose. Some others are just waiting to meet conditions that will allow them to enter the Eurozone (like Croatia did last year)

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

The UK adopts various EU rules, a lot of stuff even sold in Northern Ireland has to abide by EU rules (so just say that Apple did make separate lightning and USB C phones, they'd have to use separate operations to sell specific ones in parts of the UK and not others, it probably would have been easier for them to just sell the European models)

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

Hey, y’all did a good job with the FAIR act. Keep working on it

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Canada, too. We're somehow even more feckless at anti-trust.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

I'm still amazed that I'd never heard about Nortel until this year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 152 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nvidia: bans platform translation layers for CUDA

Meanwhile AMD: is forbidden from releasing an open source HDMI 2.1 driver supporting 4K@120hz because of HDMI Forums requirements.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sadly also not an open standard, in reality but they are friendlier to FOSS.

[–] Bronco1676@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least it is royality free compared to HDMI which has a large annual fee + per unit fee for manufacturers

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh. It's absolutely superior on the royalties side. Just incredibly frustrating that what should be an open standard that anyone can tinker with is not.

[–] OmnipotentEntity 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's at least partially because the specification was designed to detect and thwart attempts to tee the video and audio data in order to bypass copy protection on DVDs and Blu-Rays, iirc.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 months ago

It is indeed and the fact that I don't care about any of that makes it that much more frustrating. I got bored with piracy nearly two decades ago and just want to implement my own open-source virtual display systems in hardware and gateway I shouldn't need to either cough up thousands of dollars a year or find a copy of a PDF that someone "accidentally" left at a public location in order to do so with an established protocol standard.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

Does DP support CEC or ARC nowadays?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Can a EULA ban fair use? Google v Oracle might have something to say about this.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It can say whatever it wants unless invalidated by a court or an existing law saying otherwise.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Probably depends on your country's laws. Here in Estonia most EULAs aren't valid because pressing accept on those isn't legally binding.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What if we don't accept the EULA? Like why do we need to accept Nvidia's EULA to create translation layer of cuda?

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You probably don't but it depends where you are. Reverse engineering software without permission isn't illegal in most places but in the US I'm pretty sure it is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 47 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I give it about 10 years before the EU is invaded by the US after corporate lobbying

[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or a couple of months if the EPP win the next EU elections.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.de 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Europeans People Party, large political party within the EU which is largely full of conservative right-wing folks with the german Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen at it's top. She is also currently president of the European Commission and has been known to be involved in corruption and to favour company interests, as well as the rest of the fuckers in the EPP.

So I guess the context is: If EPP stays in power, that's good for top-business-people, but bad for everyone else. Thereby detrimental for such competitive-practise-laws.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks. It seems EU needs Navalny too. Fucking Putin.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 43 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

So a knife maker can now forbid me to cut chicken with it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mr_satan@monyet.cc 22 points 8 months ago

They can prohibit whatever they want, but how enforceable is it? Does Nvidia intend to play whack a mole by checking for translation layers?

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 20 points 8 months ago

Now imagine Microsoft banning the translation of DirectX to Vulkan. Could they do that? That would kill gaming on Linux in a snap.

[–] MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This has been said time and time again but fuck Nvidia. Preventing compatibility layers ensures games and programs that need this stuff are extra unreliable, bloated and enshittified.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Here's the problem:

Doesn't matter the country/countries. Due to bureaucracy and lobbying, this will take forever for anyone to get anything done. And by the time it's done, something better will have appeared and will be using any and all loopholes present in whatever bill they pass to do the exact same shit that is happening now.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Bottom should be MooreThreads or some other Chinese GPU maker

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 8 months ago

It's too technical.

load more comments
view more: next ›