this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

216 readers
16 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre stepped into the debate over trans rights on Wednesday, saying "biological males" should be banned from women's sports, change rooms and bathrooms.

"Female spaces should be exclusively for females, not for biological males," Poilievre said in Kitchener, Ont.

The Conservative leader made the comments after being asked if, as prime minister, he would introduce legislation to prevent "transgender women" or "biological men" from participating in female sports or entering female prisons and shelters.

"A lot of the spaces … are provincially and municipally controlled, so it is unclear ... what reach federal legislation would have to change them," Poilievre said.

"But obviously female sports, female change rooms, female bathrooms should be for females, not for biological males," he added.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 62 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Fuck this guy. What fucking washroom do I fucking use then? The one where I pass as a woman and no one notices or cares that I'm trans, or the one where I get assaulted or harassed by a man.

Guess I'll just shit myself.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago

Pretty simple from his point of view: He would rather you get assaulted, beaten, raped, and murdered.

I'm sorry you have to go through this shit.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you know that single occupant toilet with the handrail? it doesn't see a lot of use ...

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What exactly are you tying to say?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

communal bathrooms are fucking stupid and anyone who doesn't feel safe has an option

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Those one off bathrooms don't exist everywhere. Work just moved us into a building with gendered washrooms from a building that did have the single stall gender neutral washrooms.

The option isn't always there my dude.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gendered washrooms are silly. Actually enforcing gendered washrooms is pants-on-head backwards and I think everyone in this thread agrees on that.

[–] CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is a cohort of women (biological) who are very in favor of sex-separated bathrooms. Women are vulnerable to sexual assault when having to take care of bodily functions and have the unique risk of being impregnated from said assault. This article discussed issues with public toilet access and usage for women in India, for example. If a group of women in fact want sex-separated bathrooms, then I think logically that should win out over those who don't care. Men's bathrooms should also be safe for gender non conforming people and could in fact be the default bathroom for everyone.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's a fair point, but flimsy stalls that you can inadvertently make eye contact through the door gaps in, are not what I have in mind. Rather, individual rooms for doing private business, potentially with a common area for washing hands, are what I imagine, and are already being used in several establishments.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The one where you get harassed

In a more liberal society you wouldn’t get harassed for that

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Great. Thanks.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

You're not supposed to exist at all, according to people like him.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Honestly I think this is just a bad take. I didn’t see it on lemmy so I’m posting it (never done this before).

For athletes and competitive sports, realistically that’s a discussion that you need nuance for.

Blocking trans women (and not men for some reason) from change rooms and washrooms? Are there even cases where trans women are creating issues? Lesbians are perfectly capable of ogling women in those spaces anyway.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are there even cases where trans women are creating issues?

Pretty sure that's purely a right-wing boogeyman. And, let's face it: a man who wants to spy on women in a washroom just needs a janitor's coverall and some small cameras they can plant while "cleaning" or "performing repairs".

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 11 months ago

And, let’s face it: a man who wants to spy on women in a washroom just needs a janitor’s coverall and some small cameras they can plant while “cleaning” or “performing repairs”.

Or you know just walk in and hide in a stall.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

Lesbians are perfectly capable of ogling women in those spaces anyway.

Yeah, but that's OK since it's sexy and makes his little PP hard.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

Follow up question for PP, what's a biological male?

[–] danieljoeblack 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hmm I used to be proud of being Canadian. These days it's getting harder and harder.

[–] Shenanigore@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I was ten once too

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Make a policy on any of the issues Trudeau is supposedly bungling <-> Murican' style culture war

Sweaty superhero meme.

Yeah, I'm not sure why he's doing this. I guess his general polls are looking really good so he's focusing on his own caucus? Or maybe he just wants to distract from his own (deliberate, strategic) lack of vision, since I've increasingly seen it get media attention.

[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Guess he supports women only spaces in general? Nah, who am I kidding he would ban women only spaces if he could.

[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Pierre Poilivere is attempting to begin the first stage of genocide: Classification.

[–] Tetra@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

Gross. That's all I have to say.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how he would label post-op trans women. They still have a Y chromosome, and are therefore "biological males."

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the problem with Pollievre's language.

And even pre bottom surgery trans people are vulnerable.

It feels like a given that trans people deserve to be able to use public washrooms and change rooms without fear, and I haven't seen any actual evidence they cause any issues beyond offending some closed minded people.

There are biological female spaces which it makes sense to exclude trans people from, they do have different experiences than cis women when it comes to growing up, periods, giving birth, etc. But bathrooms don't seem like one them.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I remember that headline where the story is that a bunch of cis girls in a changeroom were perving on their underage swim teammate and staring at her penis. Like literally there were lines in the article that were like "I couldn't stop staring at my teammate's dick". And then the headline on the article and the narrative framing is "trans girl makes teammates uncomfortable by using changeroom for its intended purpose. How dare she!"

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Found it: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10445679/Lia-Thomas-UPenn-teammate-says-trans-swimmer-doesnt-cover-genitals-locker-room.html

'It's definitely awkward because Lia still has male body parts and is still attracted to women,' one swimmer on the team told DailyMail.com in an exclusive interview.

While Lia covers herself with a towel sometimes, there’s a decent amount of nudity, the swimmer said. She and others have had a glimpse at her private parts.

"Help, help, I'm being repressed! I stared at a teenage girl's genitals and now I'M uncomfortable!"

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That feels like one of those cases where someone should step in and separate her because that situation sounds uncomfortable for everyone… or even bringing a screen to separate her if they don’t have access to another space for her to change.

There’s not that many trans people, it feels like accommodating this would be easy.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Most boys are perfectly capable of being in the same room as a penis without losing their minds. If we're going to end segregation then we need to get everyone comfortable with being in the same room as other naked people. I say we give those pervy cis girls some mandatory sensitivity training on when it is not appropriate to look at other people's junk.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Personally I think any sport which has rankings / championships should be separated by biological sex rather than gender.

Allow anyone to join "XY" teams but only allow female-at-birth to join "XX" teams. Unless it's a just-for-fun league then anyone can join.

It does get complicated though with intersex and whatnot, but unfortunately life isn't fair and some people draw the short straw. They can join the "XY" leagues if they are good enough.

[–] CorvusNyx 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Couple of things. Politicians have zero idea of what they’re talking about, especially one like Pollieve who’s looking to demonize trans women to rile up his base. Calling someone a “biological male” is just their fancy way of saying “man in a dress”. It’s their way of making it seem like they’re less transphobic than they actually are.

Trans women and trans men are biologically no different from their cis counterparts. Trans women lose the muscle mass and strength they had when testosterone was their primary sex hormone. They perform no better or worse than cis women when it comes to sports. Trans women take on the same health risks as cis women; and the same can be said for trans men.

Furthermore, chromosomes don’t work the way you’re suggesting here either. They act more like blueprints during development in the womb. There are also XY cis women with androgen insensitivities, as well as cis women who produce higher levels of testosterone.

Long story short, you don’t need a degree in biology to understand the arguments being put forth by Pollieve and folks like him are absolute bunk. They’re intended to antagonize people against trans folks.

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

trans women and men are biologically no different than their cis counterparts.

I want to start by saying I don’t have a horse in the race, I’m not a competing athlete (anymore) and honestly believe sports should be accessible to anyone but, I have seen “reports” (who knows how accurate) of trans women wiping the floor with cis women athletes. Like the D1 swimmer. Or, Natalie Ryan(who’s a disc golfer which is my niche). Are these largely outliers?

I honestly don’t know enough about biology to know how the human body reacts to those treatments. If you’re correct, that’s awesome! While it’s more inconclusive(at least as far as I’m aware) if you’re outclassing your competitors, you should have to play with your skill level. In terms of disc golf, there’s FPO(female professional open) and MPO(mixed professional open). If you don’t really have competition at FPO, you should have to play MPO.

Now, in my example, there are more layers because disc golf is a tiny sport, Natalie Ryan wins any small tournament she’s in, but when it comes to the big ones, she’s middle of the road. So, I’m not going to say she’s the prime example of “dominating a female field” and honestly, not sure there is one. So, you’re probably onto something.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre stepped into the debate over trans rights on Wednesday, saying "biological males" should be banned from women's sports, change rooms and bathrooms.

Last month, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith unveiled a slate of controversial legislative changes, expected to be tabled in the fall, that will significantly alter the province's student gender identity, sports and surgery policies.

When questioned about Smith's changes in the foyer of the House of Commons, Poilievre said the decision to pursue transgender treatments should be reserved for adults alone.

New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs's changes to Policy 713 require school staff to get the consent of parents before letting LGBTQ students under age 16 use the names and pronouns they choose in classrooms.

Last fall, 69 per cent of delegates to the Conservative Party's policy convention voted in favour of a motion that said those under the age of 18 should be prohibited from accessing "life-altering medicinal or surgical interventions" to treat "gender confusion and dysphoria."

"I think Mr. Poilievre and politicians like him are choosing to attack some of the most vulnerable people in our society as a way of deflecting from the fact that they are very good at creating division and anger," Trudeau said Wednesday.


The original article contains 708 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Why are we still talking about this? Who cares? Let people use whatever washrooms they want, is it even an issue? it's completely fabricated by the right at this point and im tired of it.