406
Don't believe that you're always gonna be protected by some judge somewhere.
Get a proper VPN, dammit!
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
406 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
1455 readers
42 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In the end, you can't out-tech the law. You need rights.
Your so-called "rights" won't hold to the pressure of massive media capital alone. It will erode away.
They have so far. It's still legal to use a VPN without verifying my identity. It's still legal, though difficult, to access the Internet anonymously. The local police department doesn't blanket monitor everyone's search history.
increasingly difficult tech solutions for privacy are a bandaid not a cure.
Yo! What's a proper VPN these days? It seems like all the ones I used to trust went to shit.
ProtonVPN
I personally like Mullvad, their practices, and their straightforward price of 5€/month. They’re not going to try to lure you in with discounts by subscribing for multiple months or years. Now if Mullvad has gone downhill, someone chime in.
Mullvad doesn't do port forwarding anymore, AirVPN seems like a good replacement but I forgot where they are based
Just self-host a VPN on a VPS so you can enable disk encryption and disable logging.
load more comments
(12 replies)
Ain't nobody going to talk about that guy in the thumbnail eating a CD while wearing that hat? Stock photos are weird.
I miss r/WTFstockPhotos
And now with AI they can get even weirder, specially if they trained it on already weird stock photos.
load more comments
(1 replies)
When will Sony be sued for stealing their customer's legally purchased digital media
February 31st.
Too long. I hope on Feb 30
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A federal appeals court today overturned a $1 billion piracy verdict that a jury handed down against cable Internet service provider Cox Communications in 2019.
If the correct legal standard had been used in the district court, "no reasonable jury could find that Cox received a direct financial benefit from its subscribers' infringement of Plaintiffs' copyrights," judges wrote.
The case began when Sony and other music copyright holders sued Cox, claiming that it didn't adequately fight piracy on its network and failed to terminate repeat infringers.
Cox's appeal was supported by advocacy groups concerned that the big-money judgment could force ISPs to disconnect more Internet users based merely on accusations of copyright infringement.
If not overturned, this decision will lead to an untold number of people losing vital Internet access as ISPs start to cut off more and more customers to avoid massive damages."
In today's 4th Circuit ruling, appeals court judges wrote that "Sony failed, as a matter of law, to prove that Cox profits directly from its subscribers' copyright infringement."
The original article contains 543 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Really Cox should be paying pornhub.com for such strong "customer acquisition" support imho