TinyWall
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
822 readers
20 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Windows comes with quite the advanced firewall built in. Why not use that?
The built in firewall is proprietary, which is enough of a reason to prefer a free software alternative.
What's the point? Any free software alternatives will still rely on the proprietary TCP/IP stack in Windows.
The point of software freedom is, and has been for the last 40 years, the four freedoms. Replacing proprietary software with a free alternative is always worth it, in my opinion.
Sure, ideally the entire operating system would be replaced with a free alternative, but not everyone is willing or able to make such a big change right out of the gate. Windows users deserve freedom, too. The FSF calls this "climbing the freedom ladder".
What about windows 7?
Yes, Windows 7 too.
Does a lot more than TrackerControl as it's a full firewall. TrackerControl is just DNS blocking.
You could set up a pi-hole on your router to get a similar effect to tracker control on all devices connected to the internet through the router.
Pi-hole is great but is for dns and is easy to avoid if client change default dns. Simplewall is better for granularity in windows.