this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
393 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

1444 readers
21 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While we can be pretty confident that Reddit has its own motivations (i.e. self-interest) for fighting these lawsuits, this is still a good news story for pirates.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 45 points 9 months ago

I was going to download their movies to spite them, but looking it up they've only produced complete trash.

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 40 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I am so conflicted on which side should I be on :/

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 48 points 9 months ago (3 children)

A rough translation of a brazilian quote for you: "In a fight between these guys, I cheer for the fight".

[–] shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

I'm gonna say this all the time now

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

That's poetry

[–] europa_will_live@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Brazilian phonk intensifies

[–] onion@feddit.de 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You don't have to (and shouldn't) side with any for profit company

[–] explodicle@local106.com 16 points 9 months ago

I'm glad Reddit won here because it sets a precedent that will protect less well-funded Lemmy instances.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Small exception for when two for profit companies are fighting each other. At that point it becomes a question of which is the lesser evil.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago

So like the US elections.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago

If the film industry wins that could be a really awful precedent. Just sayin'

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

Welll y'know what they say, the enemy of my enemy is my friend and all that

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Firms wanted seven years' worth of IP address logs

I doubt - or hope they don't - Reddit stores them for that long?

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 21 points 9 months ago

It's data that could have value, so I doubt they don't store it. I think the movie studios didn't offer enough. Or Reddit thought it was too damaging for this particular sale.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Le reddit wins legain, m'fellows!

[–] Cwilliams 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] BurningRiver 3 points 9 months ago

Careful now, IBM is also awfully litigious.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In a motion to compel that was filed last month, movie companies Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures argued that "Reddit users do not have a recognized privacy interest in their IP addresses."

But in Wednesday's ruling, US Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson said, "The Court finds no reason to believe provision of an IP address is not unmasking subject to First Amendment scrutiny."

Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures previously sued the Internet service provider Frontier Communications, alleging that it is liable for its users' copyright infringement.

The fact that movie companies only sought IP addresses instead of names this time around wasn't enough to sway the court.

As in the previous cases, the movie companies "cannot show that the information they seek here is unavailable from other sources," Hixson wrote.

Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures cited Reddit posts in which users say that Frontier didn't terminate their Internet service despite sending many copyright infringement notices about torrent downloads.


The original article contains 598 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!