this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lugh@futurology.today 15 points 9 months ago (7 children)

There are vast vested interests in keeping the fossil fuel industry afloat. It supports entire countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia. Not to mention the stock portfolios and wealth it gives to many among the richest and most powerful elsewhere.

I expect anti-battery disinformation will increase as panic sets in from those with a lot to lose.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

It won't make a difference.

Battery deployments have already turned a profit on their original cost for stationary storage. There are enough clever businessmen out there that can now see the proof of this that the stationary storage market will explode. While I can see consumers not buying cars when they should because of disinformation the growth and improvement in batteries will continue without that. At some point they will change when it becomes a lot better than ICE.

But the consumer car market is a fuckup anyway because we should be working on getting cars off the road and funding public transport.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Good. I will gladly have all my oil stocks go to zero if it means we can reduce our dependence on it significantly across the globe.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Iirc all these gulf economies which are reliant on oil are already massive investors in renewables too. They are also diversifying into tourism too with Saudi Arabia set to host 2034 WC and qatar hosting the latest one.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

I think disinformation is unfortunately a grey area these days. There are a lot of downsides to some of the green tech but anyone who brings it up is immediately called out as being somehow bribed by a oil company.

load more comments (3 replies)