this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
246 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1034 readers
39 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 99 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sick speedrun strat

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 77 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I was happy for a second and then remembered that karma is a bad take and that he will be getting the absolute best available healthcare and even if he does die, he will be doing so having gotten to old age, in extreme luxury and in more comfort than any of us will ever experience.

I worry that if he does die soon it will only embolden royalist sentiment in this country as the grieving masses will cling on to the "young king" which the media will spin as "progressive" or whatever, and we'll just keep getting further and further away from abolishing this disgusting establishment.

We seriously need a King Ralph type thing to happen, only the people take over, instead of a stereotypical American. Turn Buckingham palace in to a community centre with a kitchen and a shelter and childcare and a free mental health clinic, and put those gardens to actual use..

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

What exactly do you hate about him? Is it his stance on climate change or the Prince Trust maybe? The Royal family are an important source of culture, tourism, and soft power when the UK’s overseas influence is waning. What good to you think will come of getting rid of them?

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The Royal family are an important source of culture, tourism, and soft power

The Royal family isnt an important source of tourism.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Feel free to educate yourself bootlicker, I'll even start you off, but I don't have the energy this evening to invest in someone with their head that deep up the ass of the establishment stomping an all our necks..

https://www.republic.org.uk/tourism

https://giving-evidence.com/2020/07/16/royal-findings/

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 8 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It doesn't explain why you have so much venom. I see the royal family as British heritage. I don't see how having a monarchy with no real power has any effect on the day to day lives of British people. Certainly not enough to explain the hate.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 27 points 7 months ago

You know what else is a British heritage? Famines in India.

Aristocracy is privilege without any kind of merit whatsoever. It costs the tax payer millions and undermines democracy.

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So some guy came to England, killed another guy who claimed to rule it, and now we have to watch their family spend eternity in decadent luxury because "British Heritage". pfft.

Tell you what. I'll go perform some actions that make myself king, and then a few generations from now my family will be British heritage. Then we can all be happy.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Not to mention that British heritage belongs to a German dynasty.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

a monarchy with no real power

I don’t know if it’s that you don’t know anything about the royal family, or that you don’t know anything about how power works, or both.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They have influence, not governing power. Sure you could argue they don't deserve the influence they have just for being in that position. The main point however is questioning the /hate/. I know you're not the poster who I was replying to, but I didn't want to distract the point of my post. Why should we hate the monarchy so much?

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They have influence, not governing power

The old man that this post is about literally does have governing power, not only in the UK but also in 14 other countries including Australia and Canada. A common argument made by monarchists is that the monarch's actual influence is negligible, and their governing power should be ignored because it is only ceremonial.

As Wikipedia puts it:

Royal assent is the method by which a monarch formally approves an act of the legislature, either directly or through an official acting on the monarch's behalf. Under a modern constitutional monarchy, royal assent is considered little more than a formality. Even in nations such as the United Kingdom, Norway, the Netherlands, Liechtenstein and Monaco which still, in theory, permit their monarch to withhold assent to laws, the monarch almost never does so, except in a dire political emergency or on advice of government.

But... there is a catch:

screenshot of the top of wikipedia "royal assent" article showing "Not to be confused with King's Consent."

It turns out that there is also a less formal process (or a "parliamentary convention"; another part of the UK's heritage is having an "unwritten constitution", whatever that means) called King's Consent whereby the monarch, in secret, is consulted before parliament is allowed to debate anything which might affect their personal interests. And it turns out, a lot of things might affect their personal interests, so, this procedure has been and continues to be used to review, shape, and in some cases veto, numerous laws before they are allowed to be debated by parliament. You can read more here.

🤡

[–] noxfriend 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They don't even need that sort of power for the argument to hold weight but yes, they do hold exactly that sort of power and use it for things like ensuring that Buckingham Palace isn't affected by racial equality in employment laws https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/08/royals-vetted-more-than-1000-laws-via-queens-consent

Then they hide it from us, too

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 14 points 7 months ago

That is quite a damnig article. Thanks I understand your view on that now.

[–] noxfriend 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

They are "British heritage" because they killed, conquered and stole from our ancestors.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago

The UK truly is in shambles if their tourism industry and culture depend on a cabal of ghouls siphoning vast amounts of wealth from the people purely for show.

Personally, I like to think the people of the UK have a lot more to them than their vestigial rulers.

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

i actively want the UKs overseas influence to wane

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago

You think no tourist will go to see the palace if the inbreeds don't exist anymore?

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

We seriously need a King Ralph type thing to happen

More like King Louis XVI type thing to happen

[–] venji10@feddit.de 47 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Who cares about this random man having cancer?

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 7 months ago

When he dies the UK will spend around $300 milion on his funeral and a party for his kid.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So brave and controversial of you to pretend he's just a random man

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 41 points 7 months ago (8 children)

It will be so funny if he takrs a sharp turn downhill and dies. Dude was famous for never getting a chance to be king and then to go out so quickly would be * chef's kiss *

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 25 points 7 months ago (7 children)

It is nevertheless another human you are talking about.

[–] LoveSausage@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] computerscientistI@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The royal family, including Charles are big proponents of homeopathy. Let's see how much homeopathy is going to help him now. I'm sure at least as much as those alternative methods Steve Jobs chose helped him, back then...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shepstr@feddit.uk 32 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Jesus, lemmy is full of hate

[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 37 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I have 0 sympathy for monarchial families living off the backs of UK taxpayers for... Centuries :|

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yea, I don't wish death upon the guy but come on, get a job now

[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 18 points 7 months ago (18 children)

As an American, if I got cancer like this dude has, having a job there is a very high chance I'd be destitute IF I lived. World class medical treatment off the backs of his subjects.. yeahno my dude, worlds smallest violen playing.jpeg

He can wipe his cancer tears up with whatever the largest denomination of pounds you guys use is xD

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago

Do you want a list of the atrocities committed by the English monarchy?

Hate for this family is deserved

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

for this guy, who leeches off the work of real human beings and hides child rapists from justice? absolutely, my hate for him is a source of strength and pride, I'm glad to have it on display.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kusukasaka281@lemmy.id 30 points 7 months ago

Oh no... anyway...

[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Becomes king

Fucking dies

Lmaooo

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

English taxpayers paying for another coronation ceremony be like: 🥶*

* can't pay to heat their house.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

~~Prostate cancer is very common, very survivable, and very easily treatable. It's a serious health problem, but he's almost definitely gonna be fine~~

Me fail reading comprehension. The article says it's NOT prostate cancer

[–] urfavlaura@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

oh no anyway

but in all seriousness I hope he dies that guy is a piece of shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I just got my first Chucky Buck this weekend, we can’t switch to a new currency this quickly! Our economy is in shambles!

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

See mate, the mint make a profit on money, do you think it costs £50 to run off one of them little plastic things.

Edit: just realised you were one of our dear Canadian brethren. See hoser, the Canadian mint make a profit on money, you think it costs a loonie to strike of them little metal things?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Never mind the cancer. That old building speaks?!

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

With as much as the White House and Number 10 speak, this surprises you?

[–] 0xtero 8 points 7 months ago

Oh no.
Anyways

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Oh no. A rich person with access to the best medical care in the world is sick. What ever will we do.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, which king William will William be?

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The one from Epstein Island

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›