this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
123 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

626 readers
1 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lelgenio@lemmy.ml 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)
  • Posts "Surprised Picachu face" image
  • Gets DMCA'ed by Nintendo lawyers
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

try a disappointed sparkit

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm so behind on Pokemon that I genuinely can't tell if this is a Pokemon or a Pal.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago
[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As someone with minimal pokemon knowledge, only played two due to being older and not having Nintendo consoles really, I thought this game was a spin off till I realized no big pokemon or Nintendo logo anywhere. They must have threaded the needle to avoid that copyright infringment.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't get how this is news, it's the most predictable, obvious outcome.

Nintendo literally DMCA's hentai artists bro.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

One of these days I want to see it go to court just so that the judge and jury has to discuss the legitimacy of sexualized cartoon animals, with the defence forced to keep a straight face as they try to explain why a person banging a goodra with giant jugs in a wedding dress isn't infringing copyright. Just a bunch of professional adults in a room forced to dance around the elephant in the room because it's irrelevant to the case.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Slow news day for games journalism and writers trying to justify their paychecks. Plus, I'd imagine it helps those who were running bets not on if Nintendo would crush it, but how long before they did.

[–] FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

Wow.. didn’t see that coming.. /s

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 months ago

This was expected, concidering it's using copyrighted characters

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jako301@feddit.de 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Nah, that one's legit. Nintendo does a lot of fucked up claims, but this is a 1 to 1 ripoff of their IP and models.

[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Be Weird, Download a Car, Generate Art, Fuck Copyrights

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jako301@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

The mod. Palworld should be distinct enough in gameplay and monster design that any lawsuit would fail.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

And a broken clock is right twice a day. Sure this one is legit, it's still Nintendo's legal department. Just because they're right this time doesn't change anything.

[–] Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

Yeah turns out putting it behind a paywall pisses of Nintendo lmao.